Miller Andrew G, Bartle Renee M, Feldman Alexandra, Mallory Palen, Reyes Edith, Scott Briana, Rotta Alexandre T
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2700-2719. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-332.
Respiratory failure is a common reason for pediatric intensive care unit admission. The vast majority of children requiring mechanical ventilation can be supported with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) but certain cases with refractory hypoxemia or hypercapnia may require more advanced modes of ventilation. This paper discusses what we have learned about the use of advanced ventilator modes [e.g., high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV), high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA)] from clinical, animal, and bench studies. The evidence supporting advanced ventilator modes is weak and consists of largely of single center case series, although a few RCTs have been performed. Animal and bench models illustrate the complexities of different modes and the challenges of applying these clinically. Some modes are proprietary to certain ventilators, are expensive, or may only be available at well-resourced centers. Future efforts should include large, multicenter observational, interventional, or adaptive design trials of different rescue modes (e.g., PROSpect trial), evaluate their use during ECMO, and should incorporate assessments through volumetric capnography, electric impedance tomography, and transpulmonary pressure measurements, along with precise reporting of ventilator parameters and physiologic variables.
呼吸衰竭是儿科重症监护病房收治的常见原因。绝大多数需要机械通气的儿童可以通过传统机械通气(CMV)得到支持,但某些难治性低氧血症或高碳酸血症的病例可能需要更先进的通气模式。本文讨论了我们从临床、动物和实验研究中了解到的关于使用先进通气模式[如高频振荡通气(HFOV)、高频冲击通气(HFPV)、高频喷射通气(HFJV)、气道压力释放通气(APRV)和神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)]的情况。支持先进通气模式的证据薄弱,主要包括单中心病例系列,尽管已经进行了一些随机对照试验(RCT)。动物和实验模型说明了不同模式的复杂性以及在临床应用中的挑战。一些模式是特定呼吸机所独有的,价格昂贵,或者可能只在资源丰富的中心才有。未来的工作应包括针对不同挽救模式的大型多中心观察性、干预性或适应性设计试验(如PROSpect试验),评估它们在体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)期间的使用情况,并应通过容积式二氧化碳描记法、电阻抗断层成像和跨肺压测量进行评估,同时精确报告呼吸机参数和生理变量。