• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.2%洗必泰与 10%聚维酮碘用于口腔手术前口周皮肤消毒的效果比较:一项临床试验。

Comparative efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% Betadine for perioral skin disinfection prior to oral surgical procedures: a clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Oct;191(5):2207-2211. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02850-6. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-021-02850-6
PMID:34767148
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a possible postoperative complication. Preoperative application of antiseptics on the surgical site can decrease the rate of SSIs.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 10% Betadine (povidone-iodine) for perioral skin disinfection prior to oral surgical procedures.

METHODS

This clinical trial (IRCT20181017041365N1) (registration date: 2019/05/04) evaluated 57 male patients who were randomly selected among those presenting to the Periodontology Department of Ahvaz Jundishapur University. Baseline microbial samples were collected from the perioral skin at the right and left sides of the face in each patient by sterile swabs. Next, the perioral area was disinfected with 10% Betadine in the right side and 0.2% CHX in the left side. Secondary microbial samples were then collected. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare the colony counts. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Data were analyzed with the Stata program, version15.1.

RESULTS

The bacterial colony count was 3147 (314,700) in the Betadine and 3139 (313,900) in the CHX group at baseline (P = 0.86). These values changed to 1196 (119,600) in the Betadine (P < 0.001) and 857 (85,700) in the CHX (P < 0.001) group after disinfection. A significant difference was found in colony count between the CHX and Betadine groups after intervention (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

According to the results, 0.2% CHX has higher antimicrobial efficacy than 10% Betadine for perioral disinfection prior to oral surgical procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20181017041365N1. Registered on 2019/05/04.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)是一种可能的术后并发症。术前在手术部位使用防腐剂可以降低 SSI 的发生率。

目的

本研究旨在比较 0.2%洗必泰(CHX)和 10%聚维酮碘(碘伏)在口腔手术前对口周皮肤消毒的效果。

方法

本临床试验(IRCT20181017041365N1)(注册日期:2019 年 5 月 4 日)评估了 57 名随机选自阿瓦兹 Jundishapur 大学牙周病科的男性患者。每位患者的面部右侧和左侧口周皮肤均用无菌拭子采集基线微生物样本。然后,右侧用 10%碘伏,左侧用 0.2%CHX 对口周区域进行消毒。然后采集二次微生物样本。采用 Wilcoxon 配对符号秩和检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验比较菌落计数。显著性水平设为 p≤0.05。数据采用 Stata 程序(版本 15.1)进行分析。

结果

碘伏组的细菌菌落计数为 3147(314700),CHX 组为 3139(313900),基线时(P=0.86)。碘伏组的菌落计数降至 1196(119600)(P<0.001),CHX 组降至 857(85700)(P<0.001)。干预后 CHX 组和碘伏组的菌落计数有显著差异(P=0.0001)。

结论

根据结果,0.2%CHX 对口周消毒的抗菌效果优于 10%碘伏,适用于口腔手术前。

试验注册

IRCT20181017041365N1。注册于 2019 年 5 月 4 日。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine and 10% Betadine for perioral skin disinfection prior to oral surgical procedures: a clinical trial.0.2%洗必泰与 10%聚维酮碘用于口腔手术前口周皮肤消毒的效果比较:一项临床试验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Oct;191(5):2207-2211. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02850-6. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
Preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine: a prospective analysis of 6959 consecutive spinal surgery patients.术前皮肤消毒用葡萄糖酸洗必泰和聚维酮碘的比较:6959 例连续脊柱手术患者的前瞻性分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Feb;28(2):209-214. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE17158. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘用于剖宫产术皮肤消毒的随机开放标签对照试验:CAPICA试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):463.e1-463.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.060. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
4
No need for preoperative antiseptics in elective outpatient plastic surgical operations: a prospective study.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):529-31. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142438.39280.3f.
5
Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.用于预防清洁手术后手术伤口感染的术前皮肤消毒剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub3.
6
The impact of preoperative skin disinfection on preventing intraoperative wound contamination.术前皮肤消毒对预防术中伤口污染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Mar;9(3):109-13. doi: 10.1086/645805.
7
Observational study on preoperative surgical field disinfection: povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-alcohol.术前手术区域消毒的观察性研究:聚维酮碘和氯己定-酒精。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Dec;17(24):3367-75.
8
Surgical solutions for preoperative skin preparation in total hip arthroplasty: A cost-effectiveness analysis of Betadine® and Chloraprep™.髋关节置换术术前皮肤准备的手术解决方案:聚维酮碘和氯己定的成本效益分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Oct;108(6):103355. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103355. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
Effect of Surgical Skin Antisepsis on Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.妇科腹腔镜手术中术野皮肤消毒对手术部位感染的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):807-815. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1953.
10
No risk of surgical site infections from residual bacteria after disinfection with povidone-iodine-alcohol in 1014 cases: a prospective observational study.1014 例患者经聚维酮碘-酒精消毒后无残留细菌导致手术部位感染的风险:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):565-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182468b2d.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete Spontaneous Bone Regeneration following Surgical Enucleation of a Mandibular Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma.下颌骨牙骨质化纤维瘤手术摘除后完全自发骨再生
Case Rep Dent. 2022 Aug 5;2022:7902602. doi: 10.1155/2022/7902602. eCollection 2022.
2
Perspectives for restriction of dental treatment complexity during and after Covid-19.新冠疫情期间及之后限制牙科治疗复杂性的前景。
Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022;46(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00739-7. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
[Toxin effects from chlorhexidine gluconate: case report].[葡萄糖酸氯己定的毒素效应:病例报告]
Tandlaegebladet. 1990 Sep;94(12):489-91.