St. George's University Hospital, UK.
University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Dec;17(12):1301-1309. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.2006635. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
The role of biologic treatments in severe asthma continues to expand, with five agents now approved. Selection of biologic treatment has become increasingly complex in the setting of overlapping indications and in the absence of head-to-head trials. Long-term safety data are still limited for more recently approved agents.
We review the evidence supporting the choice of biologic and predicting treatment response utilizing existing widely available biomarkers. In addition, we provide a digest of the long-term safety data currently available for agents approved since 2015. Data sources were identified by using PubMed in 2021.
We generally favor omalizumab in the first instance for those severe asthma patients also eligible for other biologics, due to the greater long-term safety data available for this agent. Clinical characteristics predicting response, treatment priorities, and comorbidities must also be considered.
生物制剂在重度哮喘中的作用不断扩大,目前已有五种药物获得批准。在适应证重叠且缺乏头对头试验的情况下,生物制剂的选择变得越来越复杂。最近批准的药物的长期安全性数据仍然有限。
我们回顾了支持选择生物制剂的证据,并利用现有的广泛可用的生物标志物来预测治疗反应。此外,我们还提供了自 2015 年以来批准的药物的长期安全性数据摘要。2021 年,我们通过使用 PubMed 来确定数据来源。
对于那些也符合其他生物制剂适应证的重度哮喘患者,我们通常首选奥马珠单抗,因为该药物有更多的长期安全性数据。还必须考虑预测反应的临床特征、治疗重点和合并症。