784 Manor Way, Los Altos, CA, 94024, USA.
Center for Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA; Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2022 Mar-May;169-170:3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
In light of illusions of the Modern Synthesis (MS) listed by Noble (2021a), MS's key concept, that gradual accumulation of gene mutations within microevolution leads to macroevolution, requires reexamination too. In this article, additional illusions of the MS are identified therein caused by the absence of system information and correct history. First, the MS lacks distinction among the two basic types of information: genome-defined system and gene-defined parts-information, as its treatment was based mostly on gene information. In contrast, it is argued here that system information is maintained by species-specific karyotype code, and macroevolution is based on the whole genome information package rather than on specific genes. Linking the origin of species with system information shows that the creation and accumulation of the latter in evolution is the fundamental question omitted from the MS. Second, modern evidence eliminates the MS's preferred theory that present evolutionary events can be linearly extrapolated to the past to reconstruct Life's history, wrongly assuming that most of the fossil record supports the gradual change while ignoring the true karyotype/genome patterns. Furthermore, stasis, as the most prominent pattern of the deep history of Life, remains a puzzle to the MS, but can be explained by the mechanism of karyotype-preservation-via-sex. Consequently, the concept of system-information is smoothly integrated into the two-phased evolutionary model that paleontology requires (Eldredge and Gould, 1972). Finally, research on genome-level causation of evolution, which does not fit the MS, is summarized. The availability of alternative concepts further illustrates that it is time to depart from the MS.
鉴于诺布尔(2021a)列出的现代综合理论(MS)的错觉,MS 的关键概念,即微观进化中基因突变的逐渐积累导致宏观进化,也需要重新审视。在本文中,由于缺乏系统信息和正确的历史,确定了 MS 中的其他错觉。首先,MS 缺乏两种基本类型信息的区别:基因组定义的系统和基因定义的部分信息,因为它的处理主要基于基因信息。相比之下,这里认为系统信息是由物种特有的染色体组代码维持的,宏观进化是基于整个基因组信息包而不是特定基因。将物种起源与系统信息联系起来表明,系统信息在进化中的创造和积累是现代综合理论遗漏的根本问题。其次,现代证据消除了现代综合理论的首选理论,即目前的进化事件可以线性外推到过去重建生命的历史,错误地假设大部分化石记录支持渐变,而忽略了真正的染色体组/基因组模式。此外,停滞是生命深层历史中最突出的模式,仍然是现代综合理论的一个难题,但可以通过性保染色体组机制来解释。因此,系统信息的概念被顺利地纳入了古生物学需要的两阶段进化模型(Eldredge 和 Gould,1972)。最后,总结了与现代综合理论不符的进化的基因组水平因果关系的研究。替代概念的可用性进一步表明,现在是时候离开现代综合理论了。