Solís-Cordero Katherine, Duarte Luciane Simões, Jeong Joshua, Fujimori Elizabeth
School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Costa Rican Evidence-Based Nursing Research Collaboration Program (CIEBE-CR): A JBI Affiliated Group, San José, Costa Rica.
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Mar 1;20(3):874-881. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00147.
This review will evaluate the effectiveness of different health delivery agents of parenting stimulation interventions versus usual care, no intervention, or a different type of delivery agent on child development outcomes among children aged 0 to 36 months.
Stimulation interventions vary in terms of implementation. While some interventions are delivered by professionals, most are delivered by non-professionals. Several prior systematic reviews on this topic have been conducted; however, no known study has evaluated the effectiveness of stimulation interventions on child development by type of delivery agent.
This review will consider randomized controlled trials assessing parenting stimulation interventions delivered by different health delivery agents. These will be compared to usual care, no intervention, or a different delivery agent, targeted at caregiver-child dyads of children aged 0 to 36 months. The outcomes will include motor, language, cognitive, and socio-emotional development. The review will exclude studies including children with specific characteristics, interventions that do not focus on parenting, and protocols of randomized clinical trials.
The review will include both published and unpublished studies. The key information sources to be searched are: MEDLINE, APA (PsycNet), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, VHL Regional Portal, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Theses Canada Portal, and Library and Archives Canada. Studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese will be included. Critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted using standardized tools. Quantitative data, where possible, will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, or if statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be reported narratively.
PROSPERO CRD42021245245.
本综述将评估不同育儿刺激干预的健康服务提供者与常规护理、无干预或不同类型的服务提供者相比，对0至36个月儿童的发育结果的有效性。
刺激干预在实施方面各不相同。虽然一些干预由专业人员提供，但大多数由非专业人员提供。此前已针对该主题进行了几项系统综述；然而，尚无已知研究按服务提供者类型评估刺激干预对儿童发育的有效性。
本综述将纳入评估不同健康服务提供者提供的育儿刺激干预的随机对照试验。这些试验将与常规护理、无干预或不同的服务提供者进行比较，针对的是0至36个月儿童的照顾者 - 儿童二元组。结果将包括运动、语言、认知和社会情感发展。本综述将排除包括具有特定特征儿童的研究、不专注于育儿的干预措施以及随机临床试验方案。
本综述将纳入已发表和未发表的研究。要检索的关键信息来源包括：MEDLINE、美国心理学会数据库（PsycNet）、Embase、Scopus、科学引文索引核心合集、护理学与健康领域数据库（CINAHL）、VHL区域门户、谷歌学术、科学Direct、加拿大论文门户以及加拿大国家档案馆。将纳入英文、西班牙文和葡萄牙文的研究。将使用标准化工具进行批判性评价和数据提取。如有可能，定量数据将汇总进行统计元分析，或者如果无法进行统计汇总，将以叙述方式报告研究结果。
PROSPERO CRD42021245245。
