J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 Nov 5;27(6):427-438. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000580.
Insight is considered a multidimensional concept and, in the context of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), impairment in insight has been widely reported to be associated with severity and other clinical and sociodemographic variables. However, the studies concerning insight in OCD have produced heterogenous data as a result of the scales used to measure insight. To overcome this heterogeneity, the study presented here used 4 different widely used and validated insight scales. The objective was to evaluate various aspects of insight using these scales to identify the relationships between different aspects of insight and clinical and sociodemographic variables to assess which scale or scales might possess greater efficiency in clinical practice. For this purpose, a descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional study of 81 patients in treatment in a mental health center was conducted. Patients were evaluated using the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale, the Overvalued Ideas Scale, the Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorders, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. The results reported significant relationships between insight and scores on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Thoughts, Compulsions, and Total scales), Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and significant differences with regard to sex, level of education, working status, and course of the disorder. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationships among the 4 insight scales. The results of this analysis suggest that the scales that measure insight in a multidimensional way (Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale and Overvalued Ideas Scale) provide more information about the severity of the disorder in patients with OCD.
洞察力被认为是一个多维的概念,在强迫症 (OCD) 的背景下,洞察力的损害被广泛报道与严重程度和其他临床和社会人口统计学变量有关。然而,由于用于测量洞察力的量表不同,关于 OCD 中洞察力的研究产生了异质数据。为了克服这种异质性,本研究使用了 4 种广泛使用和验证的洞察力量表。目的是使用这些量表评估洞察力的各个方面,以确定洞察力的不同方面与临床和社会人口统计学变量之间的关系,评估哪种或哪些量表在临床实践中可能更有效。为此,对一家心理健康中心接受治疗的 81 名患者进行了描述性、观察性和横断面研究。使用布朗信念评估量表、过度评价量表、心理障碍意识量表、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表、临床总体印象量表、总体功能评估量表和 Rey-Osterrieth 复杂图形测试对患者进行评估。结果报告洞察力与耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(思维、强迫和总分)、临床总体印象量表和总体功能评估量表的评分之间存在显著关系,与性别、教育程度、工作状态和疾病病程存在显著差异。进行了相关性分析,以评估 4 种洞察力量表之间的关系。该分析结果表明,以多维方式测量洞察力的量表(布朗信念评估量表和过度评价量表)为 OCD 患者提供了更多关于疾病严重程度的信息。