• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Insight in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Relationship With Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics.强迫症的洞察:与社会人口学和临床特征的关系。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 Nov 5;27(6):427-438. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000580.
2
Phenomenology of OCD: lessons from a large multicenter study and implications for ICD-11.强迫症的现象学:来自一项大型多中心研究的经验教训及对《国际疾病分类第11版》的启示
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Oct;57:141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
3
Clinical features of pure obsessive-compulsive disorder.单纯强迫症的临床特征。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;54(7):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
4
Efficacy of Augmentation of Cognitive Behavior Therapy With Weight-Adjusted d-Cycloserine vs Placebo in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.认知行为疗法联合体重调整的 d-环丝氨酸与安慰剂治疗儿童强迫症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 1;73(8):779-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1128.
5
Clinical picture of obsessive-compulsive disorder with poor insight: a regression model.自知力差的强迫症临床图景:一种回归模型
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Sep 15;136(2-3):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.04.015.
6
The relationship between clinical characteristics, metacognitive appraisals, and cognitive insight in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者的临床特征、元认知评估与认知洞察力之间的关系。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;70(8):591-8. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1188150. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Is it time to change the gold standard of obsessive-compulsive disorder severity assessment? Factor structure of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.是否到了改变强迫症严重程度评估的黄金标准的时候了?耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表的因子结构。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;54(7):732-742. doi: 10.1177/0004867420924113. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Clinical subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder based on the presence of checking and washing compulsions.基于检查和洗涤强迫行为的强迫症临床亚型。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;27(3):201-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462005000300008. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
9
Obsessive-compulsive traits in children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome.艾斯伯格综合征儿童和青少年的强迫特质。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;19(1):17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00787-009-0035-6. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
10
Dimensional correlates of poor insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder.在强迫症中洞察能力差的维度相关因素。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 15;35(7):1677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling Gender Differences in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Focus on Key Micronutrients.揭示强迫症中的性别差异:关注关键微量营养素。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79667. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79667. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
From compulsivity to compulsion: the neural basis of compulsive disorders.从强迫性到强迫:强迫症的神经基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024 May;25(5):313-333. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00807-z. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Comparison of Disease Severity, Anxiety and Depression in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients with Different Insight.不同自知力的强迫症患者的疾病严重程度、焦虑和抑郁的比较。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Feb;52(1):10-18.
4
Changes in insight throughout the natural four-year course of obsessive-compulsive disorder and its association with OCD severity and quality of life.强迫症自然病程四年间领悟力的变化及其与强迫症严重程度和生活质量的关联。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 13;14:1231293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1231293. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical practice guidelines on the use of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: systematic review.用于治疗强迫症的脑深部电刺激临床实践指南:系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 8;9(5):e148. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.539.

强迫症的洞察:与社会人口学和临床特征的关系。

Insight in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Relationship With Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 Nov 5;27(6):427-438. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000580.

DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000580
PMID:34768265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8575164/
Abstract

Insight is considered a multidimensional concept and, in the context of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), impairment in insight has been widely reported to be associated with severity and other clinical and sociodemographic variables. However, the studies concerning insight in OCD have produced heterogenous data as a result of the scales used to measure insight. To overcome this heterogeneity, the study presented here used 4 different widely used and validated insight scales. The objective was to evaluate various aspects of insight using these scales to identify the relationships between different aspects of insight and clinical and sociodemographic variables to assess which scale or scales might possess greater efficiency in clinical practice. For this purpose, a descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional study of 81 patients in treatment in a mental health center was conducted. Patients were evaluated using the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale, the Overvalued Ideas Scale, the Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorders, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. The results reported significant relationships between insight and scores on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Thoughts, Compulsions, and Total scales), Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and significant differences with regard to sex, level of education, working status, and course of the disorder. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationships among the 4 insight scales. The results of this analysis suggest that the scales that measure insight in a multidimensional way (Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale and Overvalued Ideas Scale) provide more information about the severity of the disorder in patients with OCD.

摘要

洞察力被认为是一个多维的概念,在强迫症 (OCD) 的背景下,洞察力的损害被广泛报道与严重程度和其他临床和社会人口统计学变量有关。然而,由于用于测量洞察力的量表不同,关于 OCD 中洞察力的研究产生了异质数据。为了克服这种异质性,本研究使用了 4 种广泛使用和验证的洞察力量表。目的是使用这些量表评估洞察力的各个方面,以确定洞察力的不同方面与临床和社会人口统计学变量之间的关系,评估哪种或哪些量表在临床实践中可能更有效。为此,对一家心理健康中心接受治疗的 81 名患者进行了描述性、观察性和横断面研究。使用布朗信念评估量表、过度评价量表、心理障碍意识量表、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表、临床总体印象量表、总体功能评估量表和 Rey-Osterrieth 复杂图形测试对患者进行评估。结果报告洞察力与耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(思维、强迫和总分)、临床总体印象量表和总体功能评估量表的评分之间存在显著关系,与性别、教育程度、工作状态和疾病病程存在显著差异。进行了相关性分析,以评估 4 种洞察力量表之间的关系。该分析结果表明,以多维方式测量洞察力的量表(布朗信念评估量表和过度评价量表)为 OCD 患者提供了更多关于疾病严重程度的信息。