Wang Jennifer, Chapman Zyg, Cole Emma, Koide Satomi, Mah Eldon, Overstall Simon, Trotter Dean
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 5;10(21):5176. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215176.
Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps (DIEP, MS-TRAM) at a single institution (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria) between 2016 and 2021.
126 female patients (mean age: 50 ± 10 years) were analysed, with 41 and 85 patients in the ciNPT (Prevena) and non-ciNPT (Comfeel) groups, respectively. There were reduced wound complications in almost all outcomes measured in the ciNPT group compared with the non-ciNPT group; however, none reached statistical significance. The ciNPT group demonstrated a lower prevalence of surgical site infections (9.8% vs. 11.8%), wound dehiscence (4.9% vs. 12.9%), wound necrosis (0% vs. 2.4%), and major complication requiring readmission (2.4% vs. 7.1%).
The use of ciNPT for abdominal donor sites in breast reconstruction patients with risk factors for poor wound healing may reduce wound complications compared with standard adhesive dressings; however, large scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations. Investigation of the impact of ciNPT patients in comparison with conventional dressings, in cohorts with equivocal risk profiles, remains a focus for future research.
闭合切口负压治疗(ciNPT)可能会降低伤口并发症的发生率,并促进切口部位的愈合。我们报告了在腹部游离皮瓣供区的乳房重建患者中使用这种敷料的经验。
对2016年至2021年期间在单一机构(维多利亚州皇家墨尔本医院)接受腹部游离皮瓣(DIEP、MS-TRAM)乳房重建的所有患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。
分析了126例女性患者(平均年龄:50±10岁),ciNPT(Prevena)组和非ciNPT(Comfeel)组分别有41例和85例患者。与非ciNPT组相比,ciNPT组几乎所有测量结果中的伤口并发症都有所减少;然而,均未达到统计学意义。ciNPT组手术部位感染的发生率较低(9.8%对11.8%)、伤口裂开(4.9%对12.9%)、伤口坏死(0%对2.4%)以及需要再次入院的严重并发症(2.4%对7.1%)。
对于有伤口愈合不良风险因素的乳房重建患者,在腹部供区使用ciNPT与标准粘性敷料相比,可能会减少伤口并发症;然而,需要大规模随机对照试验来证实这些观察结果。在风险特征不明确的队列中,研究ciNPT患者与传统敷料相比的影响,仍然是未来研究的重点。