• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化工企业人员失误分类:以 2010 年至 2017 年韩国各类化工事故为例。

Classification of Human Failure in Chemical Plants: Case Study of Various Types of Chemical Accidents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University, Worldcupro 206, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea.

Safety Department, Coupang, 570 Tower 730, Songpa-daero, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05510, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111216.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111216
PMID:34769734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583617/
Abstract

The increasing use and distribution of chemicals are causing serious chemical accidents such as fires, explosions, and leaks during manufacturing and handling. In most cases, all risks caused by chemicals are classified as accidents due to defects in process facilities, human errors, and multi-cause accidents. Among chemical accidents caused by human errors, accurate analysis of accidents caused by the complex action of various types of human failures is required. Based on the accident investigation reports that occurred in South Korea from 2010 to 2017, chemical accidents caused by human failure were analyzed, and the fundamental causes were derived by classifying them into human error and violation. Human failure was analyzed according to the classification criteria for human failure of health and safety executive (HSE). As a result of the analysis, several types of human failure acted in combination to be a more significant cause of chemical accidents; incorrect application of process rules and procedures, inappropriate chemical information, lack of education, and defects in the current safety regulation were analyzed as the main causes. In addition, the cause of human errors was presented through case studies of chemical accidents in South Korea.

摘要

化学品的使用和分布日益增加,在制造和处理过程中会导致严重的化学事故,如火灾、爆炸和泄漏。在大多数情况下,由于工艺设施缺陷、人为错误和多因事故而导致的所有化学品风险都被归类为事故。在人为错误导致的化学事故中,需要准确分析各种人为故障复杂作用引起的事故。基于 2010 年至 2017 年在韩国发生的事故调查报告,对人为失误导致的化学事故进行了分析,并通过将其分类为人为错误和违规行为来得出根本原因。根据健康和安全执行官 (HSE) 的人为错误分类标准,对人为失误进行了分析。分析结果表明,几种类型的人为失误共同作用是导致化学事故的更重要原因;对工艺规则和程序的不正确应用、不适当的化学信息、缺乏教育以及现行安全法规的缺陷被分析为主要原因。此外,还通过韩国化学事故的案例研究提出了人为错误的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/fc52f8f73b07/ijerph-18-11216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/59dddc5c2f02/ijerph-18-11216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/145a1b1fbc8b/ijerph-18-11216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/45d470d8cfc2/ijerph-18-11216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/e114fe75663d/ijerph-18-11216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/767fccb49f6d/ijerph-18-11216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/8ebd2f2d1375/ijerph-18-11216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/313c51fb565e/ijerph-18-11216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/fc52f8f73b07/ijerph-18-11216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/59dddc5c2f02/ijerph-18-11216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/145a1b1fbc8b/ijerph-18-11216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/45d470d8cfc2/ijerph-18-11216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/e114fe75663d/ijerph-18-11216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/767fccb49f6d/ijerph-18-11216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/8ebd2f2d1375/ijerph-18-11216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/313c51fb565e/ijerph-18-11216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c0/8583617/fc52f8f73b07/ijerph-18-11216-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Classification of Human Failure in Chemical Plants: Case Study of Various Types of Chemical Accidents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.化工企业人员失误分类:以 2010 年至 2017 年韩国各类化工事故为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111216.
2
Flammable Substances in Korea Considering the Domino Effect: Assessment of Safety Distance.考虑多米诺效应的韩国易燃物质:安全距离评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 18;16(6):969. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060969.
3
Feasibility Evaluation of Designated Quantities for Chemicals Requiring Preparation for Accidents in the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.韩国化学事故预防体系中要求事故预备的化学品指定数量的可行性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061927.
4
Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences.化学事故中的多米诺效应:主要特征和事故序列。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Nov 15;183(1-3):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.061. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
Human and organizational factors in Chinese hazardous chemical accidents: a case study of the '8.12' Tianjin Port fire and explosion using the HFACS-HC.中国危险化学品事故中的人为与组织因素:运用HFACS-HC对“8·12”天津港火灾爆炸事故的案例研究
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Sep;24(3):329-340. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1372943. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
[Causes of Countermeasures Against Serious Accidents Caused by Health Hazards of Chemical Substances, Based on Cases of Occupational Accidents in Japan].[基于日本职业事故案例的化学物质健康危害引发严重事故的原因及对策]
J UOEH. 2023;45(4):243-257. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.45.243.
7
Causes and prevention of mobile crane-related accidents in South Korea.韩国流动式起重机相关事故的原因及预防
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):469-478. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1775384. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Types and Characteristics of Fatal Accidents Caused by Multiple Processes in a Workplace: Based on Actual Cases in South Korea.工作场所多工序致亡事故的类型及特征:基于韩国实际案例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042047.
9
Mechanisms Analysis for Fatal Accident Types Caused by Multiple Processes in the Workplace: Based on Accident Case in South Korea.基于韩国事故案例的工作场所多工序致命事故类型的机理分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 11;19(18):11430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811430.
10
Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea.韩国使用基于 GIS 的风险分析技术的危险化学品泄漏事故应急疏散计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;16(11):1948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111948.

引用本文的文献

1
Poison Center Surveillance of Occupational Incidents with Hazardous Materials (2016-2023): Insights for Risk Mitigation and Incident Preparedness.毒物中心对危险材料职业事故的监测(2016 - 2023年):风险缓解与事故防范的见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 25;22(2):158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020158.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Human Factors Relationship in Hazardous Chemical Storage Accidents.危险化学品储存事故中人因关系分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176217.
2
Development and Verification of a Risk Index for Evaluating the Chemical Accident Risk of Korean Chemical Enterprises.韩国化工企业化学品事故风险评估风险指数的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224409.
3
Interested consumers' awareness of harmful chemicals in everyday products.
感兴趣的消费者对日常用品中有害化学物质的认知。
Environ Sci Eur. 2017;29(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12302-017-0127-8. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
Psychological effects of a disastrous hydrogen fluoride spillage on the local community.一起灾难性的氟化氢泄漏事件对当地社区的心理影响。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 Sep 11;29:40. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0196-6. eCollection 2017.
5
What must be done to prevent another humidifier disinfectant disaster?必须采取什么措施来防止加湿器消毒剂灾难再次发生?
Environ Health Toxicol. 2016 Nov 24;31:e2016024. doi: 10.5620/eht.e2016024. eCollection 2016.
6
Evaluation of blast injury patients from the 2015 Tianjin explosions in China.对来自2015年中国天津爆炸事件的爆炸伤患者的评估。
Burns. 2016 Aug;42(5):1133-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
7
Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant.工作许可证制度中的人为错误分析:以一家化工厂为例
Saf Health Work. 2016 Mar;7(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
A critical evaluation of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) for engineered nanomaterials.对工程纳米材料的材料安全数据表(MSDSs)的批判性评估。
Chem Health Saf. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jchas.2012.02.002.
9
Review of the current state and main sources of dioxins around the world.全球二噁英的现状及主要来源综述。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Sep;65(9):1033-49. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1058869.
10
Health care plan for hydrogen fluoride spill, Gumi, Korea.韩国龟尾市氟化氢泄漏医疗保健计划。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Nov;27(11):1283-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.11.1283. Epub 2012 Oct 30.