• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作许可证制度中的人为错误分析:以一家化工厂为例

Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant.

作者信息

Jahangiri Mehdi, Hoboubi Naser, Rostamabadi Akbar, Keshavarzi Sareh, Hosseini Ali Akbar

机构信息

Research Center for Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2016 Mar;7(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002
PMID:27014485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4792918/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A permit to work (PTW) is a formal written system to control certain types of work which are identified as potentially hazardous. However, human error in PTW processes can lead to an accident.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted to estimate the probability of human errors in PTW processes in a chemical plant in Iran. In the first stage, through interviewing the personnel and studying the procedure in the plant, the PTW process was analyzed using the hierarchical task analysis technique. In doing so, PTW was considered as a goal and detailed tasks to achieve the goal were analyzed. In the next step, the standardized plant analysis risk-human (SPAR-H) reliability analysis method was applied for estimation of human error probability.

RESULTS

The mean probability of human error in the PTW system was estimated to be 0.11. The highest probability of human error in the PTW process was related to flammable gas testing (50.7%).

CONCLUSION

The SPAR-H method applied in this study could analyze and quantify the potential human errors and extract the required measures for reducing the error probabilities in PTW system. Some suggestions to reduce the likelihood of errors, especially in the field of modifying the performance shaping factors and dependencies among tasks are provided.

摘要

背景

工作许可证(PTW)是一种正式的书面系统,用于控制某些被确定为具有潜在危险的工作类型。然而,PTW流程中的人为错误可能导致事故。

方法

本横断面描述性研究旨在估计伊朗一家化工厂PTW流程中人为错误的概率。在第一阶段,通过与工厂人员进行访谈并研究工厂的程序,使用层次任务分析技术对PTW流程进行分析。在此过程中,将PTW视为一个目标,并对实现该目标的详细任务进行分析。下一步,应用标准化工厂分析风险-人(SPAR-H)可靠性分析方法来估计人为错误概率。

结果

PTW系统中人为错误的平均概率估计为0.11。PTW流程中人为错误概率最高的是可燃气体检测(50.7%)。

结论

本研究中应用的SPAR-H方法可以分析和量化潜在的人为错误,并提取降低PTW系统中错误概率所需的措施。提供了一些降低错误可能性的建议,特别是在修改绩效塑造因素和任务之间的依赖性方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfda/4792918/d29f476a5ca9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfda/4792918/c513bb670abd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfda/4792918/d29f476a5ca9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfda/4792918/c513bb670abd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfda/4792918/d29f476a5ca9/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant.工作许可证制度中的人为错误分析:以一家化工厂为例
Saf Health Work. 2016 Mar;7(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
2
Human reliability assessment in a Mo/Tc generator production facility using the standardized plant analysis risk-human (SPAR-H) technique.在一个钼/锝发生器生产设施中使用标准化工厂分析风险-人员(SPAR-H)技术进行人员可靠性评估。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):321-330. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1415832. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Application of a Bayesian network to quantify human reliability in nuclear power plants based on the SPAR-H method.基于 SPAR-H 方法的贝叶斯网络在核电厂人因可靠性量化中的应用。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2588-2598. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2026074. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
4
Human error data collection and comparison with predictions by SPAR-H.人为错误数据收集以及与SPAR-H预测结果的比较。
Risk Anal. 2014 Sep;34(9):1706-19. doi: 10.1111/risa.12199. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
5
Task analysis for industrial work process from aspects of human reliability and system safety.从人员可靠性和系统安全性方面对工业工作过程进行任务分析。
Risk Anal. 1999 Jun;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1007044527558.
6
Prioritizing the indicators influencing permit to work system efficiency based on an analytic network process.基于网络分析法的作业许可制度效率影响因素指标优先级排序
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Jun;28(2):1042-1052. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1862516. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Reliability of drivers in urban intersections.城市交叉口驾驶员的可靠性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
8
Identifying and preventing human error in the sugar production process: A multi-stage approach using HTA, HEC and PHEA techniques.识别和预防制糖过程中的人为错误:一种使用层次任务分析(HTA)、人因失误评估(HEC)和人因失误概率评估(PHEA)技术的多阶段方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 22;10(9):e29687. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29687. eCollection 2024 May 15.
9
Applications of integrated human error identification techniques on the chemical cylinder change task.综合人为错误识别技术在更换化学气瓶任务中的应用
Appl Ergon. 2015 Mar;47:274-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
10
Use of modeling to identify vulnerabilities to human error in laparoscopy.使用建模来识别腹腔镜手术中人为错误的漏洞。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):311-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive consequences of occupational stress in underground mine workers: Neuropsychological observational study.地下矿工职业压力的认知后果:神经心理学观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 18;104(16):e42203. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042203.
2
Factors influencing unsafe acts in the automotive industry using grounded theory and fuzzy DEMATEL.运用扎根理论和模糊DEMATEL研究汽车行业不安全行为的影响因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):7532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92184-5.
3
Applying analytic hierarchy process and failure likelihood index method (AHP-FLIM) to assess human reliability in critical and sensitive jobs of a petrochemical industry.
应用层次分析法和失效可能性指数法(AHP-FLIM)评估石化行业关键和敏感工作中的人员可靠性。
Heliyon. 2022 May 21;8(5):e09509. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09509. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Cognitive demands and mental workload: A filed study of the mining control room operators.认知需求与心理负荷:对采矿控制室操作员的实地研究
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 5;8(2):e08860. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08860. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Classification of Human Failure in Chemical Plants: Case Study of Various Types of Chemical Accidents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.化工企业人员失误分类:以 2010 年至 2017 年韩国各类化工事故为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111216.
6
Wearable Technologies for Mental Workload, Stress, and Emotional State Assessment during Working-Like Tasks: A Comparison with Laboratory Technologies.可穿戴技术在工作任务中对精神负荷、压力和情绪状态的评估:与实验室技术的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;21(7):2332. doi: 10.3390/s21072332.
7
Dynamic Human Error Assessment in Emergency Using Fuzzy Bayesian CREAM.基于模糊贝叶斯 CREAM 的急诊动态人为失误评估
J Res Health Sci. 2020 Feb 16;20(1):e00468. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.03.