• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于有序分类机器学习方法的碰撞损伤严重程度预测

Crash Injury Severity Prediction Using an Ordinal Classification Machine Learning Approach.

机构信息

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Traffic and Transportation Security, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 223003, China.

Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111564.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111564
PMID:34770076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583475/
Abstract

In many related works, nominal classification algorithms ignore the order between injury severity levels and make sub-optimal predictions. Existing ordinal classification methods suffer rank inconsistency and rank non-monotonicity. The aim of this paper is to propose an ordinal classification approach to predict traffic crash injury severity and to test its performance over existing machine learning classification methods. First, we compare the performance of the neural network, XGBoost, and SVM classifiers in injury severity prediction. Second, we utilize a severity category-combination method with oversampling to relieve the class-imbalance problem prevalent in crash data. Third, we take advantage of probability calibration and the optimal probability threshold moving to improve the prediction ability of ordinal classification. The proposed approach can satisfy the rank consistency and rank monotonicity requirement and is proved to be superior to other ordinal classification methods and nominal classification machine learning by statistical significance test. Important factors relating to injury severity are selected based on their permutation feature importance scores. We find that converting severity levels into three classes, minor injury, moderate injury, and serious injury, can substantially improve the prediction precision.

摘要

在许多相关工作中,名义分类算法忽略了伤害严重程度之间的顺序,从而做出次优的预测。现有的有序分类方法存在等级不一致性和等级非单调性。本文旨在提出一种有序分类方法来预测交通碰撞伤害严重程度,并在现有机器学习分类方法的基础上测试其性能。首先,我们比较了神经网络、XGBoost 和 SVM 分类器在伤害严重程度预测中的性能。其次,我们利用严重程度类别组合方法和过采样来缓解碰撞数据中普遍存在的类别不平衡问题。第三,我们利用概率校准和最优概率阈值移动来提高有序分类的预测能力。所提出的方法可以满足等级一致性和等级单调性的要求,并通过统计显著性检验证明优于其他有序分类方法和名义分类机器学习。基于排列特征重要性得分,选择与伤害严重程度相关的重要因素。我们发现,将严重程度等级转换为轻伤、中度伤和重伤三个等级,可以显著提高预测精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/d2e8f810f152/ijerph-18-11564-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/c2ca4c076499/ijerph-18-11564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/5bf92f625e4c/ijerph-18-11564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/320e9f0a4600/ijerph-18-11564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/2a54e79a7844/ijerph-18-11564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/16a574a7a05b/ijerph-18-11564-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/c617b6c516f4/ijerph-18-11564-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/559a9d122483/ijerph-18-11564-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/d2e8f810f152/ijerph-18-11564-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/c2ca4c076499/ijerph-18-11564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/5bf92f625e4c/ijerph-18-11564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/320e9f0a4600/ijerph-18-11564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/2a54e79a7844/ijerph-18-11564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/16a574a7a05b/ijerph-18-11564-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/c617b6c516f4/ijerph-18-11564-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/559a9d122483/ijerph-18-11564-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8583475/d2e8f810f152/ijerph-18-11564-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Crash Injury Severity Prediction Using an Ordinal Classification Machine Learning Approach.基于有序分类机器学习方法的碰撞损伤严重程度预测
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111564.
2
Crash injury severity prediction considering data imbalance: A Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty approach.考虑数据不平衡的碰撞损伤严重程度预测:带梯度惩罚的 Wasserstein 生成对抗网络方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107271. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107271. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.基于实时交通和天气数据的不平衡碰撞预测:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(3):201-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1723794. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Classification of truck-involved crash severity: Dealing with missing, imbalanced, and high dimensional safety data.卡车事故严重程度分类:处理缺失、不平衡和高维安全数据。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281901. eCollection 2023.
5
Predicting Crash Injury Severity with Machine Learning Algorithm Synergized with Clustering Technique: A Promising Protocol.运用机器学习算法与聚类技术协同预测碰撞伤害严重程度:一项有前景的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155497.
6
A comparative study on machine learning based algorithms for prediction of motorcycle crash severity.基于机器学习算法的摩托车事故严重程度预测的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214966. eCollection 2019.
7
Injury severity prediction of traffic crashes with ensemble machine learning techniques: a comparative study.基于集成机器学习技术的交通事故损伤严重程度预测:一项对比研究。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2021 Dec;28(4):408-427. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2021.1928233. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction.四种用于碰撞严重程度预测的统计和机器学习方法的比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Design and experiment verification of a novel analysis framework for recognition of driver injury patterns: From a multi-class classification perspective.一种新颖的驾驶员损伤模式识别分析框架的设计与实验验证:从多分类的角度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:152-164. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
A machine-learning method for improving crash injury severity analysis: a case study of work zone crashes in Cairo, Egypt.一种改进碰撞事故伤害严重程度分析的机器学习方法:以埃及开罗工作区碰撞事故为例。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2020 Sep;27(3):266-275. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2020.1746814. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Scoliosis Classification and Suggested Therapeutic Approaches.评估人工智能模型在脊柱侧弯分类中的准确性及建议的治疗方法。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):4013. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144013.

本文引用的文献

1
The application of XGBoost and SHAP to examining the factors in freight truck-related crashes: An exploratory analysis.XGBoost 和 SHAP 在考察货运卡车相关事故因素中的应用:一项探索性分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Aug;158:106153. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106153. Epub 2021 May 23.
2
A deep learning based traffic crash severity prediction framework.基于深度学习的交通事故严重程度预测框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106090. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106090. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis.
为了更安全的高速公路,应用 XGBoost 和 SHAP 进行实时事故检测和特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;136:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
Classification of motor vehicle crash injury severity: A hybrid approach for imbalanced data.机动车碰撞伤害严重程度分类:一种针对不平衡数据的混合方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:250-261. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
A simple plug-in bagging ensemble based on threshold-moving for classifying binary and multiclass imbalanced data.一种基于阈值移动的简单插件式装袋集成方法,用于对二分类和多分类不平衡数据进行分类。
Neurocomputing (Amst). 2018 Jan 31;275:330-340. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.035.
6
Impact of roadway geometric features on crash severity on rural two-lane highways.道路几何特征对农村双车道公路碰撞严重程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.014.
7
Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction.四种用于碰撞严重程度预测的统计和机器学习方法的比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Investigating driver injury severity patterns in rollover crashes using support vector machine models.使用支持向量机模型研究翻车事故中驾驶员的损伤严重程度模式。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 May;90:128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Cost-sensitive AdaBoost algorithm for ordinal regression based on extreme learning machine.基于极端学习机的序回归代价敏感 AdaBoost 算法。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014 Oct;44(10):1898-909. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2299291.
10
The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives.公路碰撞伤害严重程度的统计分析:方法选择的回顾与评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Sep;43(5):1666-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.025. Epub 2011 May 2.