Jin Ya-Nan, Qiang Meng-Yun, Liu Meng-Meng, Cheng Zhi-Bin, Zhang Wang-Jian, Ryan Ian, Marks Tia, Yao Ji-Jin, Xia Liang-Ping
VIP Region, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
Department of Head and Neck Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Cancer Cell Int. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02281-4.
We aimed to comprehensively investigate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC) with different tumor responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Patients with CA-LANPC who underwent NAC followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Evaluation of tumor response in patients was conducted by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 after two to four cycles NAC. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for prognosis. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to classify participates and predict disease-free survival (DFS).
One hundred and thirty-two patients with favorable response after NAC were included. The median CC-CCD was 163 mg/m (IQR, 145-194 mg/m), and 160 mg/m was selected as the cutoff point to group patients into low and high CC-CCD groups (< 160 vs. ≥ 160 mg/m). There was significant improvement in 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 72.6%; P = 0.003) for patients receiving high CC-CCD compared to those receiving low CC-CCD. Multivariate analysis revealed that CC-CCD, T stage, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were independent prognostic factors for DFS (P < 0.05 for all). Patients were further categorized into two prognostic groups by RPA: the low-risk group (T1-3 disease with regardless of EBV DNA, and T4 disease with EBV DNA < 4000 copy/mL), and the high-risk group (T4 disease with EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copy/mL). Significant 5-year DFS improvement was observed for the high-risk group (P = 0.004) with high CC-CCD. However, DFS improvement was relatively insignificant in the low-risk group (P = 0.073).
CC-CCD was a positive prognostic factor for responders after NAC in CA-LANPC. Furthermore, CC-CCD ≥ 160 mg/m could significantly improve DFS in the high-risk group with CA-LANPC, but the benefit of high CC-CCD in the low-risk group needs further study.
我们旨在全面研究新辅助化疗(NAC)后不同肿瘤反应的局部晚期鼻咽癌(CA-LANPC)同步放化疗(CC-CCD)期间顺铂的最佳累积剂量。
回顾性分析接受NAC后以顺铂为基础的同步放化疗的CA-LANPC患者。在NAC进行两到四个周期后,根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1对患者的肿瘤反应进行评估。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型进行预后分析。进行递归分割分析(RPA)以对参与者进行分类并预测无病生存期(DFS)。
纳入132例NAC后反应良好的患者。CC-CCD的中位数为163mg/m²(四分位间距,145 - 194mg/m²),选择160mg/m²作为分界点,将患者分为低CC-CCD组和高CC-CCD组(<160 vs.≥160mg/m²)。与接受低CC-CCD的患者相比,接受高CC-CCD的患者5年DFS有显著改善(91.2%对72.6%;P = 0.003)。多变量分析显示,CC-CCD、T分期和爱泼斯坦 - 巴尔病毒(EBV)DNA是DFS的独立预后因素(均P < 0.05)。通过RPA将患者进一步分为两个预后组:低风险组(T1 - 3期疾病,无论EBV DNA情况如何,以及T4期疾病且EBV DNA < 4000拷贝/mL)和高风险组(T4期疾病且EBV DNA≥4000拷贝/mL)。高风险组接受高CC-CCD时,5年DFS有显著改善(P = 0.004)。然而,低风险组的DFS改善相对不显著(P = 0.073)。
CC-CCD是CA-LANPC中NAC后反应者的阳性预后因素。此外,CC-CCD≥160mg/m²可显著改善CA-LANPC高风险组的DFS,但高CC-CCD在低风险组中的益处需要进一步研究。