• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用行为问卷范式比较澳大利亚、中国和哥伦比亚自行车手的骑行行为。

Comparing the cycling behaviours of Australian, Chinese and Colombian cyclists using a behavioural questionnaire paradigm.

机构信息

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.

DATS (Development and Advising in Traffic Safety) Research Group, INTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Carrer del Serpis 29, 3rd Floor, DATS, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jan;164:106471. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106471. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106471
PMID:34773873
Abstract

Cyclists are vulnerable road users and face disproportionately high rates of road trauma, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Behaviour of road users is a system outcome, and thus studying cyclist behaviours can identify problems in the whole road transport system and assist in generating long-lasting, cost-effective solutions to promote cyclist safety. This study aims to investigate the similarities and disparities of cycling behaviour among countries with different income levels and cycling prevalence, and the relationships among cyclist demographic characteristics, behaviours and crash involvement. It applies the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) to measure the behaviour of cyclists in three countries: Australia (high-income, emerging cycling country), China (mid-income, traditional cycling country) and Colombia (low-income, emerging cycling country). A total of 1094 cyclists (Australia 347, China 368, and Colombia 379) with a mean age of 31.8 years completed the online questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to examine the factorial structure of the CBQ. The results showed that the three-factor CBQ (i.e., Traffic Violations, Errors and Positive Behaviours) had a stable and uniform factorial structure across all three countries. Cyclists reported more frequent positive behaviours than risky behaviours across all three countries. The Australian cyclists reported more positive behaviours and fewer violations than cyclists from the other countries, which is likely to reflect the road environment, policy and enforcement differences. Male cyclists tended to engage in more risky riding than females and reported more crash involvement. Older cyclists reported less risky riding and less involvement in crashes than younger cyclists. Cyclists who rode more often reported more frequent risky riding. The study helps understand the prevalence of risky/positive cyclist behaviours among countries and provides insights for developing systematic countermeasures to improve cycling environment and cyclist safety.

摘要

自行车出行者是道路使用者中的弱势群体,在道路创伤方面的发生率极高,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。道路使用者的行为是系统的结果,因此研究自行车出行者的行为可以发现整个道路运输系统中存在的问题,并有助于制定长期、具有成本效益的解决方案,以提高自行车出行者的安全性。本研究旨在调查不同收入水平和自行车普及程度国家的自行车出行行为的相似性和差异性,以及自行车出行者的人口统计学特征、行为和事故参与之间的关系。本研究应用自行车行为问卷(CBQ)来衡量三个国家的自行车出行者的行为:澳大利亚(高收入、新兴自行车国家)、中国(中收入、传统自行车国家)和哥伦比亚(低收入、新兴自行车国家)。共有 1094 名自行车出行者(澳大利亚 347 名,中国 368 名,哥伦比亚 379 名),平均年龄为 31.8 岁,完成了在线问卷。验证性因子分析用于检验 CBQ 的因子结构。结果表明,三因素 CBQ(即交通违规、错误和积极行为)在所有三个国家都具有稳定且统一的因子结构。自行车出行者报告的积极行为比危险行为更为频繁,这在所有三个国家都是如此。澳大利亚自行车出行者报告的积极行为比其他国家的自行车出行者更多,违规行为更少,这可能反映了道路环境、政策和执法方面的差异。男性自行车出行者比女性更倾向于危险骑行,并且报告的事故参与率更高。年龄较大的自行车出行者比年龄较小的自行车出行者危险骑行和事故参与率更低。骑车频率更高的自行车出行者报告的危险骑行更为频繁。本研究有助于了解各国自行车出行者危险/积极行为的流行程度,并为制定系统的对策以改善自行车环境和提高自行车出行者的安全性提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Comparing the cycling behaviours of Australian, Chinese and Colombian cyclists using a behavioural questionnaire paradigm.采用行为问卷范式比较澳大利亚、中国和哥伦比亚自行车手的骑行行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jan;164:106471. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106471. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Personality traits as predictors of cyclist behaviour.人格特质对自行车行为的预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;145:105704. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105704. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in Australia, New Zealand and Colombia: Same but different?澳大利亚、新西兰和哥伦比亚年轻驾驶员的危险行为及碰撞风险预测因素:相同却又不同?
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
4
Are Latin American cycling commuters "at risk"? A comparative study on cycling patterns, behaviors, and crashes with non-commuter cyclists.拉美骑自行车通勤者“有风险”吗?与非通勤骑车者的骑车模式、行为和事故的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105915. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105915. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Exploring Factors Influencing the Risky Cycling Behaviors of Young Cyclists Aged 15-24 Years: A Questionnaire-Based Study in China.探究影响 15-24 岁年轻自行车骑手危险骑行行为的因素:基于问卷的中国研究。
Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1554-1570. doi: 10.1111/risa.13499. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Bicycle Rider Behavior and Crash Involvement in Australia.澳大利亚自行车骑行者行为与撞车事故
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052378.
7
Safer cycling in the urban road environment: study approach and protocols guiding an Australian study.城市道路环境中更安全的骑行:指导澳大利亚一项研究的研究方法与方案
Inj Prev. 2015 Feb;21(1):e3. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041287. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors.性别真的重要吗?一个解释风险和积极循环行为的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
9
The Road User Behaviours of Chinese Adolescents: Data From China and a Comparison With Adolescents in Other Countries.中国青少年的道路使用者行为:来自中国的数据以及与其他国家青少年的比较。
Ann Glob Health. 2019 May 28;85(1):76. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2452.
10
Personality and Behavioral Predictors of Cyclist Involvement in Crash-Related Conditions.人格和行为因素对自行车骑行者与事故相关状况的影响预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 4;16(24):4881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244881.

引用本文的文献

1
E-scooter-related maxillofacial injuries: outcome of recent legislation change.电动滑板车相关的颌面损伤:近期立法变化的结果
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04025-z.
2
Adolescent Aggressive Riding Behavior: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Prototype Willingness Model.青少年攻击性骑行行为:计划行为理论与原型意愿模型的应用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;13(4):309. doi: 10.3390/bs13040309.