• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究影响 15-24 岁年轻自行车骑手危险骑行行为的因素:基于问卷的中国研究。

Exploring Factors Influencing the Risky Cycling Behaviors of Young Cyclists Aged 15-24 Years: A Questionnaire-Based Study in China.

机构信息

School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, China.

School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1554-1570. doi: 10.1111/risa.13499. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13499
PMID:32367568
Abstract

Road traffic crashes are the leading cause of death for young people, among whom cyclists account for a higher percentage of injuries and deaths than any other road users. This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the Young Cyclist Behavior Questionnaire (YCBQ) and investigate the relationships among demographic characteristics, cycling use-related variables, perceived risk, perceived cycling skills, and risky cycling behaviors among young people. A sample of 448 cyclists (mean age of 20.37 years) completed the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling were utilized. The YCBQ had a clear factorial structure, items with high factor loadings, and good internal consistency. The five-factor structure included traffic violations, impulsive behaviors, ordinary violations, distractions, and errors. Risky cycling behaviors could be explained by gender, age, perceived risk, and perceived cycling skills, with the model explaining 37% of the variance. Gender had the greatest impact on risky cycling behaviors; male individuals were more likely to engage in risky behaviors. Young cyclists with higher levels of perceived risk had lower probabilities of engaging in risky cycling behaviors. Cyclists with lower scores on perceived cycling skills were more likely to report engaging in risky cycling behaviors. Age significantly explained risky behaviors; the younger the cyclist was, the higher his or her risky behaviors score. This research provides a theoretical foundation for the prevention of risky behaviors among young cyclists. Regarding intervention design, attention to the identified gender differences, the need to strengthen the ability to perceive risk, and the importance of road safety education for young cyclists may promote safer cycling.

摘要

道路交通事故是年轻人死亡的主要原因,其中骑自行车的人受伤和死亡的比例高于其他任何道路使用者。本研究旨在检验青少年自行车行为问卷(YCBQ)的因素结构,并调查年轻人的人口统计学特征、与骑自行车相关的使用变量、感知风险、感知骑自行车技能与冒险骑自行车行为之间的关系。448 名自行车手(平均年龄 20.37 岁)完成了问卷。采用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和结构方程模型。YCBQ 具有清晰的因子结构、高因子负荷的项目和良好的内部一致性。五因素结构包括违反交通规则、冲动行为、普通违规、注意力分散和失误。冒险的骑行行为可以用性别、年龄、感知风险和感知骑行技能来解释,模型解释了 37%的方差。性别对冒险骑行行为的影响最大;男性更有可能从事冒险行为。感知风险较高的年轻骑手从事冒险骑行行为的可能性较低。感知骑行技能得分较低的骑手更有可能报告从事冒险骑行行为。年龄显著解释了冒险行为;骑车者越年轻,其冒险行为得分越高。这项研究为预防青少年冒险行为提供了理论基础。在干预设计方面,关注已确定的性别差异、需要加强感知风险的能力以及对年轻骑手进行道路安全教育的重要性,可能会促进更安全的骑行。

相似文献

1
Exploring Factors Influencing the Risky Cycling Behaviors of Young Cyclists Aged 15-24 Years: A Questionnaire-Based Study in China.探究影响 15-24 岁年轻自行车骑手危险骑行行为的因素:基于问卷的中国研究。
Risk Anal. 2020 Aug;40(8):1554-1570. doi: 10.1111/risa.13499. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Comparing the cycling behaviours of Australian, Chinese and Colombian cyclists using a behavioural questionnaire paradigm.采用行为问卷范式比较澳大利亚、中国和哥伦比亚自行车手的骑行行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jan;164:106471. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106471. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes?骑车人的注意力分散:它如何影响他们的危险行为和交通事故?
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 12;6:e5616. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5616. eCollection 2018.
4
Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors.性别真的重要吗?一个解释风险和积极循环行为的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
5
Personality and Behavioral Predictors of Cyclist Involvement in Crash-Related Conditions.人格和行为因素对自行车骑行者与事故相关状况的影响预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 4;16(24):4881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244881.
6
Social environment versus cycling competency predicting risk-taking in 11- to 13-year-old cyclists in The Netherlands.社会环境与骑行能力对荷兰 11 至 13 岁自行车手冒险行为的预测作用。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup3):27-32. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1613533. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Higher-order cycling skills among 11- to 13-year-old cyclists and relationships with cycling experience, risky behavior, crashes and self-assessed skill.11 至 13 岁自行车骑行者的高阶骑行技能及其与骑行经验、冒险行为、事故和自我评估技能的关系。
J Safety Res. 2018 Dec;67:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
8
Are Latin American cycling commuters "at risk"? A comparative study on cycling patterns, behaviors, and crashes with non-commuter cyclists.拉美骑自行车通勤者“有风险”吗?与非通勤骑车者的骑车模式、行为和事故的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105915. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105915. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Self-reported cycling behavior and previous history of traffic accidents of cyclists.自行报告的骑行行为和自行车骑行者的交通事故既往史。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18282-7.
10
Not gendered… but different from each other? A structural equation model for explaining risky road behaviors of female and male pedestrians.非性别化……但彼此不同?解释女性和男性行人危险道路行为的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105942. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A study exploring predictors of cell phone use while walking among adolescents based on theory of planned behavior.一项基于计划行为理论探索青少年步行时使用手机的预测因素的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):2894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24047-7.
2
Promoting safety of underground machinery operators through participatory ergonomics and fuzzy model analysis to foster sustainable mining practices.通过参与式人体工程学和模糊模型分析提高地下机械操作人员的安全性,以促进可持续采矿实践。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 15;14(1):16319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67375-1.
3
A comparative analysis of distracted driving behavior among drivers of different income levels: A case study in huainan, China.
不同收入水平驾驶员分心驾驶行为的比较分析:以中国淮南为例
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 27;10(7):e28668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28668. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
4
Self-reported cycling behavior and previous history of traffic accidents of cyclists.自行报告的骑行行为和自行车骑行者的交通事故既往史。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18282-7.
5
Adolescent Aggressive Riding Behavior: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Prototype Willingness Model.青少年攻击性骑行行为:计划行为理论与原型意愿模型的应用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;13(4):309. doi: 10.3390/bs13040309.
6
Applying multilevel analysis and the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) on unsafe actions under a road safety policy.应用多层次分析和驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)研究道路安全政策下的不安全行为。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0277750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277750. eCollection 2022.
7
Cycling-related orthopaedic fractures admitted to the Major Trauma Centre in the cycling capital of the UK.自行车相关骨科骨折患者入住英国自行车之都的主要创伤中心。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2747-2753. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04097-3. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
Bicycle Rider Behavior and Crash Involvement in Australia.澳大利亚自行车骑行者行为与撞车事故
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052378.