Hospital expenses of nosocomial infection associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in China: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a highly invasive procedure and a high-cost medical measure, but the economic impact of nosocomial infection after ECMO support remains largely uninvestigated.

METHODS

We constructed a retrospective cohort of all patients hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2013 to 2020 who had ECMO supported clinical samples. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control the impact of potential confounding variables, including demographics, commodities, and treatment, and to estimate the economic burden of nosocomial infection after ECMO support.

RESULTS

There were 194 patients with ECMO support, 136 patients had no infection after ECMO, 38 patients had infection after ECMO, of which 97.4% was lower respiratory tract infection. Compared with patients among ECMO non infection group, the main reasons for ECMO treatment of patients among ECMO infection group were supportive treatment of cardiac dysfunction (63.16% vs. 42.31%, P=0.021) and longer use of catheter (13.74±14.97 vs. 15.97±14.33 days, P=0.034). The total hospital expenses for patients among ECMO infection group and ECMO non infection group were about $55,878 and $51,277 respectively. Patients with ECMO infection had significantly higher radiate expenses, operational expenses and anesthetic expenses than those among ECMO non infection group ($119.06 vs. $69.32, P=0.025; $6,458.81 vs. $4,882.49, P=0.034; $331.62 vs. $145.56, P=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the incidence of nosocomial infection after ECMO support was relatively high, which did not lead to high total hospital expenses, but lead to higher radiate expenses, operational expenses and anesthetic expenses.