Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;57(3):305-310. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.2002928. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
To provide optimal health care for patients with acute cholecystitis in need of acute cholecystectomy, resource allocation has to be optimized. The aim of this study was to assess possible regional inequity regarding the treatment of acute cholecystitis and explore regional differences in the management of acute cholecystitis.
Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography. Between January 2010 and December 2019, 22,985 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and without prior history of acute cholecystitis were included in the study. The ratio of cholecystectomies with acute cholecystitis performed within two days of admission to hospital compared to population density was studied. Furthermore, the proportion of acute performed cholecystectomies within two days of admission in regions, with or without tertiary care centers, was also examined.
No correlation between population density and proportion of acute performed cholecystectomies was found. Regions without tertiary care centers had a higher proportion of acute cholecystectomies performed within two days (5-10%). The difference in the ratio of acute cholecystectomies within two days of admission was significant for all years investigated except 2010.
The presence of a tertiary referral center within the region had a greater influence than the population density on the chance of undergoing acute cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. There are several potential explanations for this, one being an interference of the needs of patients requiring tertiary referral center care with the needs of patients in need of acute care surgery.
为需要行急性胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎患者提供最佳的医疗保健,必须优化资源配置。本研究旨在评估急性胆囊炎治疗方面可能存在的区域性不公平现象,并探讨急性胆囊炎管理方面的区域差异。
从瑞典胆石症手术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影登记处检索数据。2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,纳入 22985 例因急性胆囊炎而行胆囊切除术且无急性胆囊炎既往史的患者。研究了在入院后两天内进行胆囊切除术与人口密度的比例。此外,还研究了有无三级护理中心的地区在入院后两天内进行急性胆囊切除术的比例。
未发现人口密度与急性胆囊切除术比例之间存在相关性。无三级护理中心的地区,在入院后两天内进行急性胆囊切除术的比例更高(5-10%)。除 2010 年外,所有研究年份的入院后两天内进行急性胆囊切除术的比例差异均有统计学意义。
区域内是否存在三级转诊中心对急性胆囊炎患者接受急性胆囊切除术的机会的影响大于人口密度。对此有几种可能的解释,其中一种解释是需要三级转诊中心护理的患者的需求与需要急性护理手术的患者的需求之间存在干扰。