Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of chronic musculoskeletal pain. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-expensive, safe, feasible modality, used recently for the treatment of MPS with promising but limited results. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) vs conventional TENS (C-TENS) in the treatment of active myofascial trigger points.
This randomized controlled trial study was carried out with 60 consecutive patients with active trapezius trigger points referred to Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic. Participants randomly assigned to receive AL-TENS, C-TENS or sham TENS (S-TENS). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs), and neck range of motion (ROM) were measured at baseline, after the first treatment sessions, after the final treatment session, and 3 months after the end of the last treatment session. Patients function was evaluated by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) at baseline, after the final treatment sessions, and 3 months after the end of intervention.
The interaction effect of time and group was significantly different when evaluating VAS (df = 4.65, F = 2.50, p = 0.038) and DASH (df = 2.63, F = 7.25, p < 0.001) in favor of active groups, as well as neck total lateral bending in favor of AL-TENS group compared other two groups (df = 4.16, F = 5.23, p = 0.001). Both VAS and DASH improved significantly at all follow-ups in AL-TENS and C-TENS groups. Of note, significant immediate improvement in all outcomes was observed only with AL-TENS.
According to the present study, both AL-TENS and C-TENS were superior to placebo in pain reduction and functional improvement. Although both TENS techniques have similar efficiency on pain reduction, functional and pain perception improvement, the AL-TENS was the superior approach when evaluating neck lateral bending ROM.
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的最常见原因之一。经皮神经电刺激(TENS)是一种廉价、安全、可行的治疗方法,最近用于治疗 MPS 具有有希望但有限的效果。本研究的目的是确定类似针灸的 TENS(AL-TENS)与传统 TENS(C-TENS)治疗活动性肌筋膜触发点的疗效。
这是一项随机对照试验研究,共纳入 60 例连续就诊于物理医学与康复科的活动性斜方肌触发点患者。参与者随机分为接受 AL-TENS、C-TENS 或假 TENS(S-TENS)组。在基线、第一次治疗后、最后一次治疗后以及最后一次治疗结束后 3 个月时,分别测量视觉模拟评分(VAS)、压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)和颈部活动范围(ROM)。在基线、最后一次治疗后以及干预结束后 3 个月时,采用手臂、肩部和手残疾(DASH)评估患者的功能。
在评估 VAS(df=4.65,F=2.50,p=0.038)和 DASH(df=2.63,F=7.25,p<0.001)时,时间与组的交互效应差异有统计学意义,以及颈部总侧向弯曲有利于 AL-TENS 组优于其他两组(df=4.16,F=5.23,p=0.001)。在 AL-TENS 和 C-TENS 组,所有随访时 VAS 和 DASH 均显著改善。值得注意的是,仅在 AL-TENS 时观察到所有结局的即刻显著改善。
根据本研究,AL-TENS 和 C-TENS 在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面均优于安慰剂。尽管两种 TENS 技术在减轻疼痛方面效率相似,但在改善功能和疼痛感知方面,AL-TENS 在评估颈部侧屈 ROM 时更具优势。