Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento Ciências da Saúde, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:576-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Mat Pilates on postural control, plantar pressure and plantar arch (ALM) in schoolchildren.
The study was a randomized clinical trial, developed at the Early Childhood Education Institute, Londrina-PR. The participants were randomly assigned to groups: Pilates Group (PG) and Control Group (CG). Patients in the CG did not perform extra physical activity (Interventions).
43 children (eight to 12 years), no prior knowledge of the Pilates method, and no exercise training in the last six months.
The exercise program was based on the Mat Pilates method, twice weekly, 50 min each, 28 sessions.
Static balance (force platform), dynamic balance (the Reach Test), ALM (plantigraphy) and plantar pressure (baropodometry). The assessors were blinded to the allocation of participants.
Three children were excluded before randomization and 40 were randomized (PG n: 20; CG n:20).12 children were excluded during the protocol (PG n:7; CG n:5) and included in the intention to treat analysis. No significant difference between groups was observed for static and dynamic balance and ALM measures. There was a significant difference in the following outcomes for the PG: the plantar pressure on the right hemibody forefoot between pre-test 38.70 ± 14.38 and post-test 42.65 ± 15.63 (ES = 0.66; SRM = 0.50). The plantar pressure on the right hemibody rearfoot between pre-test 61.10 ± 14.18 and post-test 56.85 ± 19.39 (ES = 0.68; SRM = 0.53). No adverse or harmful events were reported in any group.
There were no differences in static and dynamic postural control and ALM between PG and CG. However, children GP showed improvement in some results of plantar pressure in relation CG.
Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) (N_ RBR-8t5p7d).
评估迈特普拉提对儿童姿势控制、足底压力和足弓（ALM）的影响。
本研究为随机临床试验，在巴西朗德里纳的幼儿教育学院开展。参与者被随机分配到两组：普拉提组（PG）和对照组（CG）。CG 组患者未进行额外的体育活动（干预措施）。
43 名儿童（8 至 12 岁），以前不知道普拉提方法，并且在过去六个月内没有进行任何运动训练。
运动方案基于垫上普拉提方法，每周两次，每次 50 分钟，共 28 次。
有 3 名儿童在随机分组前被排除，40 名儿童被随机分组（PG n：20；CG n：20）。在方案实施过程中，有 12 名儿童（PG n：7；CG n：5）被排除，纳入意向治疗分析。两组在静态和动态平衡以及 ALM 测量方面无显著差异。PG 组有以下结果的差异具有统计学意义：右脚前脚掌的足底压力，从预测试 38.70±14.38 到后测试 42.65±15.63（ES=0.66；SRM=0.50）；右脚后脚掌的足底压力，从预测试 61.10±14.18 到后测试 56.85±19.39（ES=0.68；SRM=0.53）。任何一组均未报告不良或有害事件。
PG 和 CG 之间在静态和动态姿势控制以及 ALM 方面没有差异。然而，与 CG 相比，PG 组的儿童在一些足底压力的结果上有所改善。
巴西临床试验注册处（REBEC）（N_ RBR-8t5p7d）。
