• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的分层方法:普通外科住院医师申请人 Step1 成绩的预测因素。

New Heuristics to Stratify Applicants: Predictors of General Surgery Residency Applicant Step 1 Scores.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Department of Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Department of Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Mar-Apr;79(2):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.007
PMID:34776371
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2022, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores will become pass/fail. This may be problematic, as residency programs heavily rely on USMLE Step 1 scores as a metric when determining interview invitations. This study aimed to assess candidate application metrics associated with USMLE Step 1 scores to offer programs new cues for stratifying applicants.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study analyzing interviewed applicants to one general surgery residency program in 2019 and 2020. Applicant data analyzed included USMLE Step 1 scores, number of publications, clerkship scores, letter of recommendation scores (out of 2, scored by 0.25 interval), interview overall score (out of 5, scored by integer level), and standardized question score (out of 10). Each year, applicant's answers to one standardized behavioral question during their interview were scored by interviewers.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center, academic general surgery residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

Interviewed applicants at one general surgery residency program whose applications contained complete demographic information (203 out of 247).

RESULTS

Multiple Linear Regression revealed that higher surgical clerkship (β = 0.19, p = 0.006) and higher standardized interview question (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) scores were positively associated with applicant USMLE Step 1 score (F[7, 195] = 6.61, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.19). Letter of recommendation score, number of peer reviewed publications, gender, race, and applicant type (preliminary/categorical) were not associated with USMLE Step 1 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

With USMLE Step 1 scores transitioning to pass/fail, surgical residency programs need new selection heuristics. Surgery clerkship scores and standardized behavioral questions answered by applicants prior to the interview could provide a holistic view of applicants and help programs better stratify candidates without USMLE Step 1 scores.

摘要

目的

2022 年,美国医师执照考试(USMLE)Step1 成绩将变为通过/不通过。这可能会产生问题,因为住院医师项目在决定面试邀请时,严重依赖 USMLE Step1 成绩作为衡量标准。本研究旨在评估与 USMLE Step1 成绩相关的候选人申请指标,为项目提供新的线索,以便对申请人进行分层。

设计

回顾性队列研究,分析 2019 年和 2020 年一个普通外科住院医师项目的面试申请人。分析的申请人数据包括 USMLE Step1 成绩、出版物数量、实习成绩、推荐信成绩(满分 2 分,以 0.25 分间隔评分)、面试总分(满分 5 分,整数评分)和标准化问题分数(满分 10 分)。每年,面试者都会根据面试者的回答对一个标准化行为问题进行评分。

地点

三级医疗中心,学术普通外科住院医师项目。

参与者

在一个普通外科住院医师项目中面试的申请人,其申请包含完整的人口统计信息(247 人中的 203 人)。

结果

多元线性回归显示,较高的外科实习(β=0.19,p=0.006)和较高的标准化面试问题(β=0.32,p<0.001)分数与申请人的 USMLE Step1 成绩呈正相关(F[7,195]=6.61,p<0.001,R2=0.19)。推荐信分数、同行评议出版物数量、性别、种族和申请人类型(预考/分类)与 USMLE Step1 分数无关。

结论

随着 USMLE Step1 成绩变为通过/不通过,外科住院医师项目需要新的选择启发式方法。外科实习成绩和申请人在面试前回答的标准化行为问题可以全面了解申请人情况,并帮助项目在没有 USMLE Step1 成绩的情况下更好地对候选人进行分层。

相似文献

1
New Heuristics to Stratify Applicants: Predictors of General Surgery Residency Applicant Step 1 Scores.新的分层方法:普通外科住院医师申请人 Step1 成绩的预测因素。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Mar-Apr;79(2):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
General Surgery Residency Application Evaluation in a USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail World: A Retrospective Comparison.美国医师执照考试第 1 阶段通过/不通过世界中的普通外科住院医师申请评估:回顾性比较。
J Surg Res. 2021 Sep;265:317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.在被选中参加面试的普通外科申请者中,代表性不足的少数族裔所占比例较低。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e15-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.与独立外科住院医师培训项目排名选拔相关的申请人特征。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021.
5
Learning style preferences of surgical residency applicants.外科住院医师申请人的学习风格偏好。
J Surg Res. 2015 Sep;198(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review.在骨科住院医师推荐信中,性别偏见、种族偏见和评分膨胀有多明显?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jun 1;482(6):916-928. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003062. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
7
Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.种族而非性别与骨科住院医师项目录取有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1441-1449. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001553. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
A Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors: Perspectives following USMLE Step 1 Conversion to Pass/Fail and Virtual Only Interviews.血管外科项目主任调查:美国医师执照考试第一步改为及格/不及格以及仅采用虚拟面试后的观点。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Implementation of a Holistic Review Process of US Allopathic Medical Students Eliminates Non-Comparable Metrics and Bias in General Surgery Residency Interview Invitations.对美国opathic医学学生实施全面审查程序可消除普通外科住院医师面试邀请中的不可比指标和偏见。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Nov;80(11):1536-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Which Application Factors Are Associated With Outstanding Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?哪些应用因素与骨科住院医师的杰出表现相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Feb 1;481(2):387-396. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002373. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of USMLE step 2 on the screening and selection of applicants for general surgery residency positions.美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE step 2)在普通外科住院医师职位申请人筛选和选拔中的重要性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 27;9(7):e17486. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17486. eCollection 2023 Jul.