Suppr超能文献

注意能源性能差距:测试爱尔兰建筑能源性能证书的准确性。

Mind the Energy Performance Gap: testing the accuracy of building Energy Performance Certificates in Ireland.

作者信息

Coyne Bryan, Denny Eleanor

机构信息

Department of Economics, Arts Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Energy Effic. 2021;14(6):57. doi: 10.1007/s12053-021-09960-1. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

Abstract

Ireland's Climate Action Plan aims upgrade 500,000 homes to B2 Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) standard by 2030. Evidence of an Energy Performance Gap, where actual energy use differs from the EPC, could undermine progress towards such targets. This paper studies the energy performance gap for a general housing sample ( = 9923) over multiple years. It provides a novel comparison between whole-home energy use (electricity and gas) that accounts for fuel switching and removes potential rebound effects by excluding households that may have changed their behaviour following a retrofit. Results suggest that actual energy use is unresponsive to the EPC, with a range of 457 kWh/year observed across EPC-level averages for the entire sample. This difference equated to less than 5% of the sample average annual energy use observed. The Energy Performance Gap range features an average deficit of 17% below theoretical energy use. The least energy efficient dwellings feature an average difference ranging from - 15 to - 56% of the relevant EPC. Conversely, energy efficient houses display higher-than-theoretical energy use, with average surpluses ranging from 39 to 54% of the relevant EPC. Results sound a note of caution for policymakers that rely on a theoretical EPC to deliver real energy savings. Future EPCs could be improved by incorporating historical household energy usage to help improve models.

摘要

爱尔兰的气候行动计划旨在到2030年将50万套住房升级至B2能源性能证书(EPC)标准。实际能源使用与EPC不同的能源性能差距证据,可能会破坏实现此类目标的进展。本文研究了多年来一般住房样本(=9923)的能源性能差距。它对考虑了燃料转换的全家庭能源使用(电和天然气)进行了新颖的比较,并通过排除那些可能在翻新后改变了行为的家庭来消除潜在的反弹效应。结果表明,实际能源使用对EPC没有反应,在整个样本的EPC水平平均值中观察到的范围为每年457千瓦时。这种差异相当于观察到的样本平均年能源使用量的不到5%。能源性能差距范围的平均赤字比理论能源使用量低17%。能源效率最低的住宅的平均差异范围为相关EPC的-15%至-56%。相反,节能房屋的能源使用高于理论值,平均盈余范围为相关EPC的39%至54%。研究结果给那些依赖理论EPC来实现实际节能的政策制定者敲响了警钟。未来的EPC可以通过纳入家庭历史能源使用情况来改进,以帮助改进模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/8550629/6ddf7dcaa55b/12053_2021_9960_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

5
A new approach for national-scale Building Energy Models based on Energy Performance Certificates in European countries: The case of Spain.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(3):e25473. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25473. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
8
Home Energy Efficiency and Subjective Health in Greater London.大伦敦地区的家庭能源效率与主观健康状况
J Urban Health. 2021 Jun;98(3):362-374. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00513-6. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Irish residential heating demand profile dataset.爱尔兰住宅供暖需求概况数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Dec 16;58:111215. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111215. eCollection 2025 Feb.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验