Chen Jie, Zhang Ruipu, Liang Ye, Ma Yujie, Song Saiwen, Jiang Canhua
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Research Center of Oral and Maxillofacial Tumor, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 27;11:719466. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.719466. eCollection 2021.
Computer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CORPPP-guided fibular flap mandibular reconstruction and analyze the possible causes of the deviations.
From June 2015 to December 2016, 28 patients underwent fibular flap mandibular reconstruction. Virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates were applied in 15 patients while 13 patients received conventional freehand surgeries. Deviations during mandibulectomy and fibular osteotomy, and overall and triaxial deviation of the corresponding mandibular anatomical landmarks were measured by superimposing the pre- and postoperative virtual models.
The deviation of the resection line and resection angle was 1.23 ± 0.98 mm and 4.11° ± 2.60°. The actual length of fibula segments was longer than the designed length in 7 cases (mean: 0.35 ± 0.32 mm) and shorter in 22 cases (mean: 1.53 ± 1.19 mm). In patients without ramus reconstruction, deviations of the ipsilateral condylar head point (Co.), gonion point (Go.), and coracoid process point (Cor.) were 6.71 ± 3.42 mm, 5.38 ± 1.71 mm, and 11.05 ± 3.24 mm in the freehand group and 1.73 ± 1.13 mm, 1.86 ± 0.96 mm, and 2.54 ± 0.50 mm in the CORPPP group, respectively, with significant statistical differences ( < 0.05). In patients with ramus reconstruction, deviations of ipsilateral Co. and Go. were 9.79 ± 4.74 mm . 3.57 ± 1.62 mm ( < 0.05), and 15.17 ± 6.53 mm . 4.36 ± 1.68 mm ( < 0.05) in the freehand group and CORPPP group, respectively.
Mandibular reconstructions employing virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates show significantly higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction compared with conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases were required for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice would also continuously improve the design of templates.
与传统徒手手术相比,计算机辅助和模板引导的下颌骨重建具有更高的准确性和更小的变异性。联合截骨术和重建预塑形钢板定位(CORPPP)技术是下颌骨重建的可靠选择。本研究旨在评估CORPPP引导的腓骨瓣下颌骨重建的准确性,并分析偏差的可能原因。
2015年6月至2016年12月,28例患者接受了腓骨瓣下颌骨重建。15例患者应用了虚拟规划和个性化CORPPP引导模板,而13例患者接受了传统徒手手术。通过叠加术前和术后虚拟模型,测量下颌骨切除术和腓骨截骨术中的偏差,以及相应下颌骨解剖标志点的整体和三轴偏差。
切除线和切除角度的偏差分别为1.23±0.98mm和4.11°±2.60°。7例腓骨段实际长度长于设计长度(平均:0.35±0.32mm),22例短于设计长度(平均:1.53±1.19mm)。在未进行升支重建的患者中,徒手组同侧髁突头点(Co.)、下颌角点(Go.)和喙突点(Cor.)的偏差分别为6.71±3.42mm、5.38±1.71mm和11.05±3.24mm,CORPPP组分别为1.73±1.13mm、1.86±0.96mm和2.54±0.50mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在进行升支重建的患者中,徒手组和CORPPP组同侧Co.和Go.的偏差分别为9.79±4.74mm、3.57±1.62mm(P<0.05)和15.17±6.53mm、4.36±1.68mm(P<0.05)。
与传统徒手手术相比,采用虚拟规划和个性化CORPPP引导模板的下颌骨重建显示出显著更高的可预测性、便利性和准确性。然而,需要更多临床病例进行进一步的尺寸偏差分析。临床实践的应用和探索也将不断改进模板设计。