Xu Kangyong, Tong Ye, Zhao Peng, Zhou Ye, Shi Shaohui
Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Suzhou Anhui, 234000, P.R.China.
Department of Orthopedics, Aviation General Hospital of China Medical University, Beijing, 100012, P.R.China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 15;35(11):1440-1448. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107075.
To compare the effectiveness of modified distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy (DTT-HTO) and open-wedge HTO (OWHTO) in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis.
A clinical data of 80 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with HTO between January 2016 and January 2019 was retrospectively analyzed, including 40 patients treated with DTT-HTO (DTT-HTO group) and 40 patients treated with OWHTO (OWHTO group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected side, disease duration, Kellgren-Lawrence grading of osteoarthritis, and preoperative knee society score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, knee joint visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), weight-bearing line ratio (WBL), Blackburne-Peel index (BPI), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), and Insall-Salvati index (ISI) between the two groups ( >0.05). The operation time, incision length, bleeding volume, hospital stay, and complications in both groups were recorded. The KSS, HSS, and VAS scores were used to evaluated the effectiveness. A self-made questionnaire was used to evaluate the recovery of low-impact sports ability of the knee. X-ray films were used to observe the osteotomy healing and measure the HKA, PTS, WBL, and the patellar height indexes (BPI, CDI, ISI).
All operations successfully completed in both groups. The OWHTO group operated longer than the DTT-HTO group ( <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incision length, bleeding volume, and hospital stay between the two groups ( >0.05). All incisions healed by first intention in both groups. There were 2 cases of lateral hinge fractures in the OWHTO group, and 1 case of lateral hinge fracture and 2 cases of tibial plateau fractures in the DTT-HTO group. No other complications occurred. The patients in both groups were followed up 2-4 years with an average of 2.8 years. The HSS, KSS, and VAS scores in both groups significantly improved after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( <0.05). All scores gradually improved with the time and there were significant differences between different time points ( <0.05). The HSS, KSS, and VAS scores were significantly better in the DTT-HTO group than in the OWHTO group at 3 months after operation ( <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years ( >0.05). At 1 year, the low-impact sports ability of the OWHTO group was rated as excellent in 8 cases, general in 25 cases, and poor in 7 cases, and as excellent in 7 cases, general in 26 cases, and poor in 7 cases of the DTT-HTO group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( =-0.715, =0.475). X-ray film reexamination showed that the osteotomies healed in both groups. The healing time was (4.52±1.23) months in the OWHTO group, and (4.23±1.56) months in the DTT-HTO group, showing no significant difference ( =0.923, =0.359). At immediate after operation, the HKA and WBL of the two groups significantly improved when compared with the preoperative values ( <0.05). However, the pre- and post-operational difference was not significant between the two groups ( >0.05). The PTS of the OWHTO group was significantly higher than preoperative value ( <0.05), while the PTS of the DTT-HTO group was lower than preoperative value ( >0.05). The pre- and post-operational difference between the two groups was significant ( <0.05). BPI and CDI in the OWHTO group were significantly lower than preoperative values ( <0.05), but there was no significant difference in ISI when compared with preoperative value ( >0.05). There was no significant difference in the BPI, CDI, and ISI of the DTT-HTO group between pre- and post-operation ( >0.05). The pre- and post-operational differences of BPI and CDI between the two groups were significant ( <0.05), and there was no significant difference in the pre- and post-operational difference of ISI ( >0.05).
The two osteotomies in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis can significantly change the varus deformity and achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The early functional recovery of DTT-HTO is faster, which can avoid the increased PTS and patellar baja of traditional OWHTO. However, neither of the two surgical procedures can restore the patient's ideal low-impact sports ability of the knee.
比较改良胫骨远端结节 - 高位胫骨截骨术(DTT - HTO)与开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术(OWHTO)治疗内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效。
回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年1月间接受HTO治疗的80例内侧间室骨关节炎患者的临床资料,其中40例接受DTT - HTO治疗(DTT - HTO组),40例接受OWHTO治疗(OWHTO组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、体重指数、患侧、病程、骨关节炎的Kellgren - Lawrence分级以及术前膝关节协会评分(KSS)、特种外科医院(HSS)评分、膝关节视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、髋 - 膝 - 踝角(HKA)、胫骨后倾角(PTS)、负重线比(WBL)、Blackburne - Peel指数(BPI)、Caton - Deschamps指数(CDI)和Insall - Salvati指数(ISI)方面差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录两组患者的手术时间、切口长度、出血量、住院时间及并发症情况。采用KSS、HSS和VAS评分评估疗效。使用自制问卷评估膝关节低冲击运动能力的恢复情况。通过X线片观察截骨愈合情况并测量HKA、PTS、WBL及髌骨高度指数(BPI、CDI、ISI)。
两组手术均顺利完成。OWHTO组手术时间长于DTT - HTO组(<0.05)。两组切口长度、出血量及住院时间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组切口均一期愈合。OWHTO组发生2例外侧铰链骨折,DTT - HTO组发生1例外侧铰链骨折和2例胫骨平台骨折。未发生其他并发症。两组患者均随访2 - 4年,平均2.8年。与术前评分相比,两组术后HSS、KSS和VAS评分均显著改善(<0.05)。所有评分均随时间逐渐改善,不同时间点差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。术后3个月时,DTT - HTO组的HSS、KSS和VAS评分显著优于OWHTO组(<0.05)。术后6个月、1年和2年两组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后1年,OWHTO组低冲击运动能力评定为优8例,一般25例,差7例;DTT - HTO组评定为优7例,一般26例,差7例。两组间差异无统计学意义(=-0.715,=0.475)。X线片复查显示两组截骨均愈合。OWHTO组愈合时间为(4.52±1.23)个月;DTT - HTO组愈合时间为(4.23±1.56)个月,差异无统计学意义(=0.923,=0.359)。术后即刻,两组HKA和WBL较术前均显著改善(<0.05)。但两组术前与术后差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。OWHTO组PTS显著高于术前值(<0.05),而DTT - HTO组PTS低于术前值(>0.05)。两组术前与术后差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。OWHTO组BPI和CDI显著低于术前值(<0.05),但ISI与术前值相比差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。DTT - HTO组术前与术后BPI、CDI和ISI差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组间BPI和CDI术前与术后差异有统计学意义(<0.05),ISI术前与术后差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。
两种截骨术治疗内侧间室骨关节炎均可显著改善内翻畸形,疗效满意。DTT - HTO早期功能恢复更快,可避免传统OWHTO术后PTS增加及髌骨低位。然而,两种手术方式均无法恢复患者理想的膝关节低冲击运动能力。