Fan Shifen, Chen Jiao, Liu Zhouyang, Xiao Juan, Jiang Fan, Liu Xiaomei, Sun Yuan
Department of Hematology, Beijing Jingdu Children's Hospital, Beijing China.
Stem Cells Dev. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):26-31. doi: 10.1089/scd.2021.0205.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was considered as an only therapeutic strategy for chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (CAEBV) infection with few exceptions, while efficacy of various allo-HSCT conditioning regimens for CAEBV has not been fully investigated yet. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of cocktail conditioning regimen (CCR)-allo-HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RICR)-allo-HSCT for pediatric patients with CAEBV. Data of a total of 54 children with CAEBV from July 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 32 patients received VP16, total body irradiation (TBI), busulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (CCR1 group), 10 patients received VP16, ara-C, TBI, busulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and ATG (CCR2 group), and the remaining 12 patients received VP16, busulfan or melphalan, fludarabine, and ATG with or without ara-C (RICR group). The overall survival (OS), hematopoietic engraftment, the incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease, and other parameters were analyzed. After adjusting for potential confounders, CCR1 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.023; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001-0.448; < 0.02) and CCR2 (HR: 0.028; 95% CI: 0.002-0.457; < 0.02) were associated with a longer OS than RICR. The use of CCR could markedly improve the engraftment success rate and OS rate compared with RICR for pediatric patients with CAEBV.
异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)被视为慢性活动性EB病毒(CAEBV)感染的唯一治疗策略,仅有少数例外情况,而各种allo-HSCT预处理方案对CAEBV的疗效尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在比较鸡尾酒预处理方案(CCR)-allo-HSCT与减低强度预处理方案(RICR)-allo-HSCT对CAEBV患儿的有效性。回顾性分析了2015年7月至2020年12月期间共54例CAEBV患儿的数据。其中,32例患者接受了依托泊苷、全身照射(TBI)、白消安、氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)(CCR1组),10例患者接受了依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、TBI、白消安、氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和ATG(CCR2组),其余12例患者接受了依托泊苷、白消安或美法仑、氟达拉滨和ATG,加或不加阿糖胞苷(RICR组)。分析了总生存期(OS)、造血植入、严重移植物抗宿主病的发生率及其他参数。在调整潜在混杂因素后,CCR1(风险比[HR]:0.023;95%置信区间[CI]:0.001-0.448;P<0.02)和CCR2(HR:0.028;95%CI:0.002-0.457;P<0.02)与比RICR更长的OS相关。与RICR相比,CCR的使用可显著提高CAEBV患儿的植入成功率和OS率。