• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管外科服务的医院医师共同管理可改善质量结果并降低成本。

Hospitalist Co-Management of a Vascular Surgery Service Improves Quality Outcomes and Reduces Cost.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwell Health - Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwell Health - Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;80:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.050. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.050
PMID:34780942
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalists can be instrumental in management of inpatients with multiple comorbidities requiring complex medical care such as vascular surgery patients, as well as an expertise in health care delivery. We instituted a unique hospitalist co-management program and assessed length of stay, 30-day readmission rates and mortality, and performed an overall cost-analysis.

METHODS

Hospitalist co-management of vascular surgery inpatients was implemented beginning April 2019, and data was studied until March 2020. We compared this data to an eight-month period prior to implementing co-management (7/2018 - 3/2019). Patient-related outcomes that were assessed include length of stay, re-admission index, mortality index, case-mix index. Cost-analysis was performed to look at indirect and direct cost of care.

RESULTS

A total of 1,062 patients were included in the study 520 pre co-management and 542 patients were post-comanagement. Baseline case-mix index was 2.47, and post-comanagement was 2.46 (P >0.05). In terms of average length of stay (aLOS), the baseline aLOS was 5.16 days per patient, while after co-management it was significantly decreased by 1.25 days to 3.91 days (P <0.05). This improvement in length of stay opened an average of 2.4 telemetry beds per day. Similarly, excess days per patient which reflects the expected length of stay based on comorbidities, improved from -0.59 to -1.65, an improvement of -1.46.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalist co-management improves outcomes for vascular surgery inpatients, decreases length of stay, re-admission and mortality while providing a significant cost-savings. The overall average variable direct cost decreased by $1,732 per patient.

摘要

背景

医院医师在管理需要复杂医疗护理的多种合并症患者方面(如血管外科患者)具有重要作用,并且在医疗保健服务方面具有专业知识。我们实施了一项独特的医院医师共同管理计划,并评估了住院时间、30 天再入院率和死亡率,并进行了全面的成本分析。

方法

从 2019 年 4 月开始实施血管外科住院患者的医院医师共同管理,研究数据截止到 2020 年 3 月。我们将这段数据与实施共同管理前的八个月数据(2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 3 月)进行比较。评估的患者相关结果包括住院时间、再入院指数、死亡率指数、病例组合指数。进行成本分析以观察护理的间接和直接成本。

结果

共有 1062 名患者纳入研究,其中 520 名患者在共同管理前,542 名患者在共同管理后。基线病例组合指数为 2.47,共同管理后为 2.46(P >0.05)。在平均住院时间(aLOS)方面,基线 aLOS 为每位患者 5.16 天,而共同管理后显著缩短了 1.25 天,至 3.91 天(P <0.05)。住院时间的这种改善平均每天开放 2.4 张心电监护床。同样,每位患者多余天数(反映基于合并症的预期住院时间)从-0.59 改善至-1.65,改善了-1.46。

结论

医院医师共同管理改善了血管外科住院患者的预后,缩短了住院时间、再入院和死亡率,同时节省了大量成本。每位患者的总体平均可变性直接成本降低了 1732 美元。

相似文献

1
Hospitalist Co-Management of a Vascular Surgery Service Improves Quality Outcomes and Reduces Cost.血管外科服务的医院医师共同管理可改善质量结果并降低成本。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;80:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.050. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
The effect of a hospitalist comanagement service on vascular surgery inpatients.住院医师共同管理服务对血管外科住院患者的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
3
Vascular surgeon-hospitalist comanagement improves in-hospital mortality at the expense of increased in-hospital cost.血管外科医生与住院医师共同管理虽以增加住院费用为代价,但能降低住院死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
4
Hospitalist-vascular surgery comanagement: effects on complications and mortality.住院医师与血管外科共同管理:对并发症和死亡率的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Dec;44(5):233-236. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1259543. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
A Hospitalist-Led Team to Manage Patient Boarding in the Emergency Department: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Cost.由住院医师主导的团队管理急诊科患者留观:对住院时间和成本的影响。
South Med J. 2019 Dec;112(12):599-603. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001043.
6
Demonstrating value: association of cost and quality outcomes with implementation of a value-driven oncology-hospitalist inpatient collaboration for patients with lung cancer.价值体现:肺癌患者成本与质量结果与实施以价值为导向的肿瘤内科医生-住院医师住院协作之间的关联
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 17;8(1):e000381. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000381. eCollection 2019.
7
Comanagement of surgical patients between neurosurgeons and hospitalists.神经外科医生与住院医师对手术患者的共同管理。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Dec 13;170(22):2004-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.432.
8
Comparing patient outcomes of academician-preceptors, hospitalist-preceptors, and hospitalists on internal medicine services in an academic medical center.比较学术医疗中心内科服务中院士带教老师、住院医师带教老师和住院医师的患者治疗结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1672-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2982-y.
9
A validated value-based model to improve hospital-wide perioperative outcomes: adaptability to combined medical/surgical inpatient cohorts.一种经验证的基于价值的模型,可改善全院围手术期结局:适用于综合内科/外科住院患者队列。
Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):486-96; discussion 496-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f1c412.
10
Comparison of outcome measures for a traditional pediatric faculty service and nonfaculty hospitalist services in a community teaching hospital.社区教学医院中传统儿科教员服务与非教员住院医师服务的结局指标比较。
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1327-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3146.