Jiang Xiumin, Luo Yongxin, Wang Xiaotong, Chen Yiming, Wang Taiyi, He Jun, Xia Yucen, Zhao Jiaying, Chai Xiaoshu, Yao Lin, Liu Cunzhi, Chen Yongjun
Research Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China; South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Phytomedicine. 2022 Jan;94:153832. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153832. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
The combination of antiarrhythmic drugs with traditional Chinese formulas are used treatments for the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, the most effective treatment for PAF has yet to be been determined. A Bayesian network meta-analysis study was thus performed for comparing the relative efficacy and tolerability of different treatment alternatives.
A comprehensive literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is performed from eight database. Maintenance rate of sinus rhythm (MRSR), p-wave dispersion (Pd), left atrium diameter (LAD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and adverse events (AEs) were used as outcomes. We also estimated treatment rank based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). This study was performed using a Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model.
After screening, 59 RCTs involving 5,543 patients and 16 treatments were included. The results showed that Shensong-Yangxin capsule (SSYX) plus amiodarone (81%) was the most effective treatment for MRSR according to the value of SUCRA, followed by Wenxin-Keli granules (WXKL) plus amiodarone (73%). Meanwhile, SSYX plus amiodarone (7%) was most likely to reduce Pd, followed by SSYX plus metoprolol (23%), WXKL plus amiodarone (26%), WXKL plus bisoprolol (27%). Furthermore, SSYX plus amiodarone (4%) was more effective in improving LAD. WXKL plus amiodarone was preferred because it had the lowest toxicity. For benefit-risk ratio, amiodarone combined with WXKL or SSYX appeared to be the best option.
Antiarrhythmic agents combined with traditional Chinese formulas had higher efficacy and lower toxicity than other treatment alternatives. This study might provide reference to help find the better treatment options for PAF.
抗心律失常药物与中药方剂联合使用是治疗阵发性心房颤动(PAF)的常用方法。然而,PAF的最有效治疗方法尚未确定。因此,进行了一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析研究,以比较不同治疗方案的相对疗效和耐受性。
从八个数据库中对随机对照试验(RCT)进行全面的文献综述。将窦性心律维持率(MRSR)、P波离散度(Pd)、左心房直径(LAD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和不良事件(AE)作为观察指标。我们还根据累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)估计治疗排名。本研究采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析和随机效应模型进行。
筛选后,纳入了59项RCT,涉及5543例患者和16种治疗方法。结果显示,根据SUCRA值,参松养心胶囊(SSYX)加胺碘酮(81%)是治疗MRSR最有效的方法,其次是稳心颗粒(WXKL)加胺碘酮(73%)。同时,SSYX加胺碘酮(7%)最有可能降低Pd,其次是SSYX加美托洛尔(23%)、WXKL加胺碘酮(26%)、WXKL加比索洛尔(27%)。此外,SSYX加胺碘酮(4%)在改善LAD方面更有效。WXKL加胺碘酮因毒性最低而更受青睐。就效益风险比而言,胺碘酮联合WXKL或SSYX似乎是最佳选择。
抗心律失常药物与中药方剂联合使用比其他治疗方案具有更高的疗效和更低的毒性。本研究可能为寻找PAF的更好治疗方案提供参考。