Catherine A. VanGilder, MBA, BS, MT, CCRA, Bristol, Tennessee.
Jill Cox, PhD, RN, APN-c, CWOCN, FAAN, Rutgers University School of Nursing, New Brunswick, New Jersey; and Englewood Health, Englewood, New Jersey.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(6):492-503. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000817.
The purpose of this study was to determine overall pressure injury (PI) prevalence and hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) prevalence in US acute care hospitals. Additionally, analysis of patient characteristics associated with HAPIs will be presented.
Observational, cross-sectional cohort study.
An in-depth analysis of data was performed from the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ (IPUP) Survey database for years 2018-2019 that included 296,014 patients. There were 914 participating US acute care facilities in 2018 and 887 in 2019. Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence over time were also examined for 2006-2019 acute care data from 2703 unique facilities (1,179,108 patients).
Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence were analyzed from the 2006-2019 IPUP survey database. Recent data for 2018-2019 PI prevalence are reported separately for medical-surgical, step-down, and critical care unit types. PI stages, anatomic locations, Braden score associated with HAPIs, and body mass index were analyzed.
Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence data declined between 2006 and 2019; however, the prevalence plateaued in the years 2015-2019. Data from 2018 to 2019 (N = 296,014) showed that 26,562 patients (8.97%) had at least one PI and 7631 (2.58%) had at least one HAPI. Patients cared for in medical-surgical inpatient care units had the lowest overall PI prevalence (7.78%) and HAPI prevalence (1.87%), while critical care patients had the highest overall PI prevalence (14.32%) and HAPI prevalence (5.85%). Critical care patients developed more severe PIs (stage 3,4, unstageable, and deep-tissue pressure injuries [DTPIs]), which were proportionally higher than those in the step-down or medical-surgical units. The sacrum/coccyx anatomic location had the highest overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence, except for DTPIs, which most common occurred on the heel.
Overall and HAPI prevalence has plateaued 2015-2019. Prevalence of HAPIs, especially in critical care units, remain high. While medical advancements have improved survival rates among critically ill patients, survival may come with unintended consequences, including PI development.
本研究旨在确定美国急性护理医院的总体压力性损伤(PI)发生率和医院获得性压力性损伤(HAPI)发生率。此外,还将分析与 HAPI 相关的患者特征。
观察性、横断面队列研究。
对 2018 年至 2019 年期间国际压力性溃疡患病率调查(IPUP)数据库进行了深入分析,共纳入 296014 例患者。2018 年有 914 家参与的美国急性护理机构,2019 年有 887 家。还对 2006 年至 2019 年期间来自 2703 家独特机构(1179108 例患者)的急性护理数据进行了总体 PI 发生率和 HAPI 发生率的时间分析。
对 2006 年至 2019 年期间的 IPUP 调查数据库进行了总体 PI 发生率和 HAPI 发生率分析。最近 2018 年至 2019 年的 PI 发生率数据分别报告了医疗-外科、降阶梯和重症监护病房类型。分析了 PI 分期、解剖部位、与 HAPI 相关的布雷登评分和体重指数。
2006 年至 2019 年期间,总体 PI 发生率和 HAPI 发生率数据呈下降趋势;然而,2015 年至 2019 年期间,发病率趋于稳定。2018 年至 2019 年(N=296014)的数据显示,26562 例(8.97%)患者至少有一处 PI,7631 例(2.58%)患者至少有一处 HAPI。在医疗-外科住院患者中,总体 PI 发生率(7.78%)和 HAPI 发生率(1.87%)最低,而重症监护患者的总体 PI 发生率(14.32%)和 HAPI 发生率(5.85%)最高。重症监护患者发生更严重的 PI(3 期、4 期、不可分期和深部组织压力性损伤[DTPIs]),比例高于降阶梯或医疗-外科病房。除 DTPIs 外,骶骨/尾骨解剖部位的总体 PI 发生率和 HAPI 发生率最高,而 DTPIs 最常见于足跟。
2015 年至 2019 年期间,总体和 HAPI 发病率趋于稳定。HAPI 发生率,尤其是重症监护病房的 HAPI 发生率仍然很高。尽管医疗进步提高了重症患者的生存率,但生存可能带来意想不到的后果,包括 PI 的发生。