Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病与外周动脉疾病和冠状动脉疾病中心血管事件风险的比较。

Type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular events in peripheral artery disease versus coronary artery disease.

机构信息

VIVIT, Vorarlberg Institute of Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Feldkirch, Vorarlberg, Austria.

Department of Medicine I, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Vorarlberg, Austria.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Nov;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002407.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is higher in peripheral artery disease (PAD) than in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, and PAD overall confers higher cardiovascular risk than CAD. How cardiovascular risk compares between PAD and CAD patients when analyses are stratified by the presence of type 2 diabetes is unclear and is addressed in the present study.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We prospectively recorded major cardiovascular events (MACE; ie, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke) over 10.0±4.7 years in 923 patients with stable CAD, of whom 26.7% had T2DM and in 292 patients with PAD, of whom 42.1% had T2DM. Four groups were analyzed: CAD patients without diabetes (CAD/T2DM-; n=677), CAD patients with T2DM (CAD/T2DM+; n=246), PAD patients without diabetes (PAD/T2DM-; n=169) and PAD patients with T2DM (PAD/T2DM+; n=123).

RESULTS

The event rate for MACE increased over our four investigated groups: it was lowest in CAD/T2DM- patients (2.52 events per 100 person-years). It was significantly higher in CAD/T2DM+ patients (3.96 events per 100 person-years; p<0.001), in PAD/T2DM- patients (3.68 events per 100 person-years; p=0.022), and in PAD/T2DM+ patients (7.10 events per 100 person-years; p<0.001), who in turn were at a higher risk than CAD/T2DM+ or PAD/T2DM- patients (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Cox regression analysis after multivariate adjustment showed that the presence of T2DM (HR=1.44 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.92); p=0.012) and the presence of PAD versus CAD (HR=1.48 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.91); p=0.002) were mutually independent predictors of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our data show that T2DM as well as the presence of PAD versus CAD are mutually independent predictors of MACE. Patients with both PAD and T2DM are at an exceedingly high risk of cardiovascular events.

摘要

简介

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)在周围动脉疾病(PAD)患者中的患病率高于冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者,总体而言,PAD 比 CAD 带来更高的心血管风险。在本研究中,我们将分析按 T2DM 存在情况分层的 PAD 和 CAD 患者之间的心血管风险如何进行比较。

研究设计和方法

我们前瞻性地记录了 923 例稳定型 CAD 患者(其中 26.7%患有 T2DM)和 292 例 PAD 患者(其中 42.1%患有 T2DM)在 10.0±4.7 年内的主要心血管事件(MACE;即心血管死亡、心肌梗死或中风)。分析了以下 4 组患者:无糖尿病的 CAD 患者(CAD/T2DM-;n=677)、有 T2DM 的 CAD 患者(CAD/T2DM+;n=246)、无糖尿病的 PAD 患者(PAD/T2DM-;n=169)和有 T2DM 的 PAD 患者(PAD/T2DM+;n=123)。

结果

MACE 的事件发生率在我们调查的 4 组患者中逐渐升高:CAD/T2DM-患者最低(每 100 人年 2.52 例)。CAD/T2DM+患者显著更高(每 100 人年 3.96 例;p<0.001),PAD/T2DM-患者(每 100 人年 3.68 例;p=0.022),PAD/T2DM+患者(每 100 人年 7.10 例;p<0.001),而这些患者的风险又高于 CAD/T2DM+或 PAD/T2DM-患者(p=0.001 和 p<0.001)。多变量调整后的 Cox 回归分析显示,T2DM 的存在(HR=1.44(95%CI 1.09 至 1.92);p=0.012)和 PAD 与 CAD 的存在(HR=1.48(95%CI 1.15 至 1.91);p=0.002)是心血管事件的相互独立预测因素。

结论

总之,我们的数据表明,T2DM 以及 PAD 与 CAD 的存在是 MACE 的相互独立的预测因素。同时患有 PAD 和 T2DM 的患者发生心血管事件的风险极高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb02/8593703/7cca01241311/bmjdrc-2021-002407f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验