Psychology Department, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Jan;48(1):251-282. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12565. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
This article systematically reviewed 34 rigorous evaluation studies of couple relationship education (CRE) programs from 2010 to 2019 that met the criteria for Level 1 well-established interventions. Significant advances include reaching more diverse and disadvantaged target populations with positive intervention effects on a wider range of outcomes beyond relationship quality, including physical and mental health, coparenting, and even child well-being, and evidence that high-risk couples often benefit the most. In addition, considerable progress has been made delivering effective online CRE, increasing services to individuals rather than to couples, and giving greater attention to youth and young adults to teach them principles and skills that may help them form healthy relationships. Ongoing challenges include expanding our understanding of program moderators and change mechanisms, attending to emerging everyday issues facing couples (e.g., healthy breaking ups, long-distance relationships) and gaining increased institutional support for CRE.
本文系统回顾了 2010 年至 2019 年间 34 项符合一级成熟干预标准的夫妻关系教育(CRE)项目的严格评估研究。重大进展包括将更多不同和处于不利地位的目标人群纳入其中,并且干预效果不仅体现在关系质量上,还体现在身体和心理健康、共同养育,甚至儿童福祉等更广泛的结果上,并且有证据表明,高风险夫妇往往受益最大。此外,在提供有效的在线 CRE、增加针对个人而非夫妻的服务以及更加关注青年和年轻人以教授他们可能有助于他们建立健康关系的原则和技能方面,已经取得了相当大的进展。目前仍面临的挑战包括扩大我们对项目调节因素和变化机制的理解,关注夫妻面临的新兴日常问题(例如,健康分手、远距离关系),并为 CRE 获得更多机构支持。