Suppr超能文献

中国大陆非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用抗凝剂预防卒中的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in mainland China.

作者信息

Zhou Hui, Nie Xiaoning, Jiang Minghuan, Dong Weihua

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

College of Pharmacy, Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Apr;47(4):523-530. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13575. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

With the high cost, the long-term persistence of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was lower than that of warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for a long time. The prices of NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) decreased significantly over the past year in mainland China. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NOACs versus warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

A decision tree and Markov model were used to assess the treatment strategies of four NOACs versus warfarin over a lifetime horizon. For each treatment strategy, the total lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. The impact of parameter uncertainties on base-case analysis results was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the base-case analysis, compared with warfarin, apixaban had a decreased total lifetime cost of USD 389 and rivaroxaban of USD 1482, while low-dose dabigatran had an increased total lifetime cost of USD 925 and high-dose dabigatran of USD 6641, with QALY increasing by 0.53, 1.32, 0.92 and 1.83, respectively. The ICER of low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin was USD 1005 per QALY gain, while those of apixaban (-USD 734 per QALY gain) and rivaroxaban (-USD 1123 per QALY gain) were negative. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the base-case results were robust by applying certain varying parameters to the model.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

These four NOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, low-dose dabigatran and high-dose dabigatran) treatment strategies were cost-effective compared with warfarin and recommended as substitutes for warfarin treatment for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF in the healthcare system of China, which might be driven by large drug price reductions in the past year.

摘要

已知信息与研究目的

长期以来,在中国非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)成本高昂,其长期持续性低于华法林。过去一年,中国大陆地区NOACs(阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群)价格大幅下降。本研究旨在从中国医疗保健系统角度评估NOACs与华法林预防NVAF患者中风的成本效益。

方法

采用决策树和马尔可夫模型评估四种NOACs与华法林在患者终身治疗中的策略。对于每种治疗策略,计算终身总成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。通过敏感性分析评估参数不确定性对基础病例分析结果的影响。

结果与讨论

在基础病例分析中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班终身总成本降低389美元,利伐沙班降低1482美元,而低剂量达比加群终身总成本增加925美元,高剂量达比加群增加6641美元,QALY分别增加0.53、1.32、0.92和1.83。低剂量达比加群与华法林相比的ICER为每增加一个QALY获得1005美元,而阿哌沙班(每增加一个QALY获得-734美元)和利伐沙班(每增加一个QALY获得-1123美元)的ICER为负值。单向和概率敏感性分析表明,通过对模型应用某些变化参数,基础病例结果具有稳健性。

新发现与结论

与华法林相比,这四种NOAC(阿哌沙班、利伐沙班、低剂量达比加群和高剂量达比加群)治疗策略具有成本效益,在中国医疗保健系统中推荐作为华法林治疗的替代方案,用于预防NVAF患者中风,这可能是由过去一年药物大幅降价推动的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验