Retailing & Consumer Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022 Sep;35(5):609-622. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.2004132. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
Profound environmental changes will affect vast human populations, if not pose an existential threat to humanity, raising the question how individuals will adapt psychologically to address these changes and how they manage stress and anxiety in the face of chronic threats such as climate change. We propose that ecological coping (efforts to manage adaptational demands of a degrading environment) is an important construct. Our purpose is to use a person-centered approach to identify profiles of ecological coping and to determine how these profiles differ on mental health outcomes and pro-environmental behaviors in an online survey (N = 334 U.S. adults). Using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), we also investigate whether these profiles are explained based on general (demographics) or environment-specific (e.g., eco-stressors) factors. Results showed: (1) The identification of two profiles: Adaptive Approach Coping (P1; 69.46%) and Maladaptive Avoidance Coping (P2; 30.54%); (2) Environment-related factors (vs. health) are associated with the profiles; (3) All 6 environment-specific characteristics predicted profile membership. Future research and policy can use these profiles to develop interventions to increase pro-environmental engagement to address climate change.
深刻的环境变化将影响到大量的人口,如果不对人类构成生存威胁,那么人们将如何在心理上适应这些变化,以及在面对气候变化等慢性威胁时如何管理压力和焦虑,这就提出了一个问题。我们提出,生态应对(管理恶化环境的适应性需求的努力)是一个重要的概念。我们的目的是使用以人为中心的方法来确定生态应对的特征,并在一项在线调查(N=334 名美国成年人)中确定这些特征在心理健康结果和有利于环境的行为方面的差异。使用潜在剖面分析(LPA),我们还调查这些特征是否基于一般(人口统计学)或特定于环境的因素(例如,生态压力源)来解释。结果表明:(1)确定了两种特征:适应性应对策略(P1;69.46%)和适应性回避应对策略(P2;30.54%);(2)与特征相关的是与环境有关的因素(而非健康);(3)所有 6 个特定于环境的特征都预测了特征的归属。未来的研究和政策可以利用这些特征来制定干预措施,以提高有利于环境的参与度,从而应对气候变化。