Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, the Netherlands; Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Doctor Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD Tilburg, the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.072. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Heterogeneity in the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients may be explained by relatively stable individual psychological differences. Therefore, we studied multiple personality and coping traits using a person-centered approach, and examined the predictive value of this approach for patient-reported outcomes.
657 CAD patients (age = 66.39 ± 10.6; 79% men) completed multiple self-report questionnaires focusing on demographics, negative affectivity and social inhibition (DS14), neuroticism and extraversion (EPQ), resilience (DRS-15), and coping styles (CISS) after undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and treatment adherence (MOS) were assessed at 6 months follow-up. Clinical information was extracted from patients' medical records.
A step-3 latent class analysis identified four subgroup profiles: Low distress (31%), Passive coping (21%), Active coping (20%), and High distress (28%). For all patient-reported outcomes, overall significant differences between the subgroups were observed (p-values < .05). The High distress profile was associated with the highest levels of emotional distress (d's > .94), and lowest levels of positive mood (d = -1.02) and treatment adherence (d = -2.75) at follow-up. Patients with an Active coping profile also experienced increased emotional distress (d's > .50), but participated in cardiac rehabilitation most often (d = .13), and reported high levels of positive mood (d = -1.02). Patients with a Passive coping profile displayed few emotional problems after six months (d's < .30), but participation to cardiac rehabilitation was relatively low (d = .04).
This study revealed four distinct psychological latent subgroups, which were predictive of patient-reported outcomes. The results indicate that a person-centered approach is useful in explaining heterogeneity in recovery from PCI, and may enhance personalized medicine in patients with CAD.
冠心病 (CAD) 患者的预后存在异质性,这可能可以用相对稳定的个体心理差异来解释。因此,我们采用以个体为中心的方法研究了多重人格和应对特质,并探讨了这种方法对患者报告结果的预测价值。
657 名 CAD 患者(年龄=66.39±10.6;79%为男性)在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,完成了多项聚焦于人口统计学、负性情感和社交抑制(DS14)、神经质和外向性(EPQ)、韧性(DRS-15)和应对方式(CISS)的自我报告问卷。在 6 个月随访时评估抑郁症状(PHQ-9)、焦虑(GAD-7)和治疗依从性(MOS)。临床信息从患者的病历中提取。
第 3 步潜在类别分析确定了 4 个亚组特征:低压力(31%)、被动应对(21%)、主动应对(20%)和高压力(28%)。对于所有患者报告的结果,亚组之间均存在显著差异(p 值<.05)。高压力亚组与随访时最高的情绪困扰(d 值>.94)和最低的积极情绪(d=-1.02)和治疗依从性(d=-2.75)相关。具有主动应对特征的患者也经历了更多的情绪困扰(d 值>.50),但最常参加心脏康复(d=.13),并报告了较高的积极情绪(d=-1.02)。具有被动应对特征的患者在 6 个月后表现出较少的情绪问题(d 值<.30),但参与心脏康复的相对较低(d=.04)。
本研究揭示了四个不同的心理潜在亚组,这些亚组可预测患者报告的结果。结果表明,以个体为中心的方法有助于解释 PCI 后恢复的异质性,并可能增强 CAD 患者的个体化医学。