• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 采样点——来自芬兰坦佩雷的一项患者四点比较研究。

Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0260184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260184. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260184
PMID:34784386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8594827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis relies on the performance of nasopharyngeal swabs. Alternative sample sites have been assessed but the heterogeneity of the studies have made comparing different sites difficult.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to compare the performance of four different sampling sites for SARS-CoV-2 samples with nasopharynx being the benchmark.

STUDY DESIGN

COVID-19 positive patients were recruited prospectively, and samples were collected and analysed for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR from all four anatomical sites in 43 patients, who provided written informed consent.

RESULTS

All anterior nasal and saliva samples were positive, while two oropharyngeal samples were negative. There was no significant difference in the cycle threshold values of nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal samples while saliva and oropharynx had higher cycle threshold values.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior nasal swab performs as good as nasopharynx swab with saliva also finding all the positives but with higher cycle threshold values. Thus, we can conclude that anterior nasal swabs can be used for SARS-CoV-2 detection instead of nasopharyngeal swabs if the situation would require so.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 的诊断依赖于鼻咽拭子的表现。已经评估了替代样本采集部位,但研究的异质性使得比较不同部位变得困难。

目的

我们的目的是比较 43 名签署知情同意书的 COVID-19 阳性患者的 4 个不同采样部位(以鼻咽拭子为基准)的 SARS-CoV-2 样本的检测性能。

研究设计

前瞻性招募 COVID-19 阳性患者,从所有 4 个解剖部位采集样本并使用 RT-PCR 分析 SARS-CoV-2。

结果

所有前鼻和唾液样本均为阳性,而 2 个口咽样本为阴性。鼻咽和前鼻样本的循环阈值无显著差异,而唾液和口咽样本的循环阈值较高。

结论

前鼻拭子的检测性能与鼻咽拭子相当,唾液也能检测出所有阳性样本,但循环阈值较高。因此,如果需要,我们可以得出结论,前鼻拭子可用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测,而替代鼻咽拭子。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/8594827/349e046a2f30/pone.0260184.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/8594827/349e046a2f30/pone.0260184.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df2/8594827/349e046a2f30/pone.0260184.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland.SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 采样点——来自芬兰坦佩雷的一项患者四点比较研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0260184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260184. eCollection 2021.
2
Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.在口咽和深部鼻拭子检测中增加唾液检测可提高基层医疗和儿童中SARS-CoV-2的PCR检测率。
Med J Aust. 2021 Sep 20;215(6):273-278. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51188. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
Validation of saliva sampling as an alternative to oro-nasopharyngeal swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2 using unextracted rRT-PCR with the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay.采用未提取的实时 RT-PCR 联合 Allplex 2019-nCoV 检测试剂盒,验证唾液采样作为替代口咽拭子用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的方法。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Aug;70(8). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001404.
4
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.使用口腔、前鼻和鼻咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同采样方法在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.RT-PCR 法筛查 SARS-CoV-2:唾液还是鼻咽拭子?快速综述和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluation of self-collected nasal, urine, and saliva samples for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 using an EUA approved RT-PCR assay and a laboratory developed LAMP SARS-CoV-2 test.评价使用 EUA 批准的 RT-PCR 检测和实验室开发的 LAMP SARS-CoV-2 检测对自采鼻、尿和唾液样本进行 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的效果。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Jun;12(6):e1285. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1285.
8
Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.唾液样本与鼻咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测中具有可比性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0016221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00162-21. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab.对比使用两种联合口咽/鼻咽拭子样本处理方法对漱口样本进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测,比较 Cobas® 6800/8800 系统的检测结果。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6837-6840. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27245. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling.联合咽喉/鼻腔拭子取样与鼻咽取样对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测效果相当。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;40(1):193-195. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03972-y. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
2
ovid19EC: A dataset complete blood count and PCR test for COVID-19 detection in Ecuadorian population.ovid19EC:厄瓜多尔人群中用于新冠病毒检测的全血细胞计数和PCR检测数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Mar 1;47:109016. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109016. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications of COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal Swab Test.新型冠状病毒鼻咽拭子检测的并发症。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul 1;147(7):672-674. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0715.
2
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同采样方法在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 Infection by RT-PCR Using Specimens Other Than Naso- and Oropharyngeal Swabs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
使用鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子以外的标本通过逆转录聚合酶链反应诊断新型冠状病毒2019感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 21;11(2):363. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020363.
4
Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较唾液和鼻咽拭子样本在新冠病毒检测中的应用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jul;16(3):799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
6
Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较唾液和鼻咽拭子核酸扩增检测在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):353-360. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876.
7
First It Was Masks; Now Some Refuse Testing for SARS-CoV-2.先是口罩;现在有些人拒绝进行新冠病毒检测。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2015-2016. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22003.
8
Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的唾液或鼻咽拭子样本
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1283-1286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016359. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集的前鼻和唾液样本与医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-20.
10
Saliva as a Noninvasive Specimen for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.唾液作为检测新型冠状病毒2的非侵入性样本。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00776-20.