Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo 0513, Norway.
Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, Magdalenka 05-552, Poland.
Poult Sci. 2022 Jan;101(1):101533. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101533. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors' NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries.
1)一种新颖的鸡舍横切法,2)AssureWel,以及 3)挪威农场顾问的 NorWel 方法。还评估了鸡舍横切法的时间要求、观察者间可靠性以及检测福利指标的鸡舍内和鸡舍间敏感性。研究在 6 个随机选择的、年龄和鸡舍大小相似的商业白鸡层鸡群中进行,这些鸡群饲养在多层鸡舍中。鸡舍横切法包括沿着每个过道进行标准化行走,同时对整个鸡群进行 12 项福利指标的筛查:头部、背部、胸部和尾部的羽毛损失(FL)、头部、背部、尾部和脚部的伤口、脏鸡、肿胀的嗉囊、病鸡和死鸡。AssureWel 涉及对头部和背部的 FL 进行评分,以及对 50 只随机鸡的脏污程度进行评分,以及对喙修剪、敌对行为、飞行行为、需要进一步护理的鸡和死亡率进行鸡群水平的评估。NorWel 涉及对 50 只随机鸡的 8 项福利指标进行评分:头部、背部、胸部和尾部的 FL、脏污程度和头部、背部和尾部的伤口。AssureWel 检测到在背部的轻微和主要 FL(P < 0.01)以及稍微脏的鸡(P < 0.01)方面鸡群之间存在差异。NorWel 方法检测到头部(P < 0.01)、背部(P < 0.001)、胸部(P < 0.001)和尾部(P < 0.001)以及稍微脏的鸡(P < 0.05)的轻微和主要 FL 方面鸡群之间存在差异。鸡舍横切法检测到头部、背部、胸部和尾部的 FL(均 P < 0.001)、脏鸡(P < 0.05)和肿胀的嗉囊(P < 0.001)方面鸡群之间存在差异。在墙式与中央横切之间发现了更多胸部有 FL 的鸡和更多脏鸡(P < 0.05)。观察者间存在良好的一致性,除了脏鸡(P < 0.01),以及鸡舍横切法与其他采样方法之间在头部和背部的 FL 以及脏污程度方面存在正相关(P < 0.05)。三种方法完成的时间相似(每群鸡约 20 分钟)。总之,所有 3 种方法都检测到了鸡群之间福利指标流行率的显著差异。新的鸡舍横切法为蛋鸡生产者提供了一种在多层鸡舍中对母鸡福利状况进行高效和敏感的全鸡群评估的方法。