BenSassi Neila, Averós Xavier, Estevez Inma
Department of Animal Production, Neiker-Tecnalia, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Aug 6;6:236. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00236. eCollection 2019.
Assessing commercial broiler chickens' welfare usually comes at the cost of reduced precision due to the large flock sizes and required time commitments. The transect method for on-farm welfare assessment is conducted by walking within delimited paths between feeder and drinker lines within the commercial house, referred to as transects. This non-invasive method is conducted by detecting birds with signs of impaired welfare indicators, which include leg problems, sickness, body wounds, and feather dirtiness. The transect method has been validated for commercial turkey flocks but not for broiler chickens due to the large flock sizes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of the transect method in broiler chicken flocks through a capture-recapture approach of a known subpopulation of 80 birds. Groups of 10 chickens were captured and individually marked in eight locations of the house. Two observers collected the number and position of the detected marked birds while walking along non-adjacent transects (four samplings/house/day) during the two following days. Detection and repetition rates per house, and within transects, were calculated, as well as the effects of flock density, transect number/house (six vs. eight), and sampling time (morning vs. afternoon). The number of traveled transects was calculated for birds detected more than once, and the population random distribution was tested by comparing the number of observed and expected birds/transect. Results showed more than 64% of detection rate with a repetition rate/house sampling of 24% and per transect of 1.66%. Higher repetition rates in six-transect houses and during morning samplings were detected. The number of traveled transects was higher in eight-transect houses and from birds first detected at walls, indicating longer traveled distances in wider houses. In addition, bootstrapping techniques were used to calculate the optimal sampling effort. Our findings indicate that the lowest repetition rates and optimal sampling can be achieved by assessing two transects, being one wall and one central, separated by three transects in between. Such sampling procedure would provide robust results for welfare assessment of commercial broiler chicken flocks.
评估商业肉鸡的福利通常会因鸡群规模大以及所需的时间投入而导致精度降低。农场福利评估的样带法是在商业鸡舍内饲料槽和饮水线之间划定的路径内行走来进行的,这些路径称为样带。这种非侵入性方法是通过检测具有福利指标受损迹象的鸡来进行的,这些迹象包括腿部问题、疾病、身体伤口和羽毛脏污。样带法已在商业火鸡群中得到验证,但由于鸡群规模大,尚未在肉鸡中得到验证。本研究的目的是通过对80只已知亚群鸡的捕获-再捕获方法来评估样带法在肉鸡群中的稳健性。将10只鸡一组在鸡舍的八个位置进行捕获并单独标记。两名观察者在接下来的两天内沿着不相邻的样带行走(每栋鸡舍每天四次采样)时,收集检测到的标记鸡的数量和位置。计算每栋鸡舍以及样带内的检测率和重复率,以及鸡群密度、每栋鸡舍样带数量(六条与八条)和采样时间(上午与下午)的影响。对检测到不止一次的鸡计算走过的样带数量,并通过比较观察到的和预期的每条样带鸡的数量来测试鸡群的随机分布。结果显示检测率超过64%,每栋鸡舍采样的重复率为24%,每条样带的重复率为1.66%。在六条样带的鸡舍和上午采样期间检测到较高的重复率。在八条样带的鸡舍以及最初在墙边检测到的鸡走过的样带数量更高,这表明在较宽的鸡舍中行走距离更长。此外,使用自助法技术来计算最佳采样工作量。我们的研究结果表明,通过评估两条样带(一条墙边样带和一条中央样带,中间间隔三条样带)可以实现最低的重复率和最佳采样。这样的采样程序将为商业肉鸡群的福利评估提供稳健的结果。