Mestas Angie, Weiland Jerry E, Scagel Carolyn F, Grünwald Niklaus J, Davis E Anne, Mitchell Jesse N, Beck Bryan R
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Plant Dis. 2022 Apr;106(4):1157-1166. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-21-1340-RE. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
The degree of flooding commonly used to induce disease in Phytophthora root rot studies rarely occurs in container nurseries. Instead, over-irrigation and poor drainage result in plants periodically sitting in shallow pools of water. Rhododendron plants were grown in a noninfested substrate or substrate infested with or to determine whether root rot induced by flooding represents disease that occurs under simulated nursery conditions when plants are in a shallow pool of water (saucers), or are allowed to freely drain and maintained at ∼75% container capacity (CC). Generally caused more disease than , and all water treatments were conducive to root rot. In experiment 1, the amount of disease caused by flooding was similar to that in the saucer treatment (75% CC not tested) while in experiment 2, flooding often caused more rapid and severe disease than the saucer or 75% CC treatment. Pathogens differed in their response to water treatments. caused more disease in treatments with >90% substrate moisture for either a short (flood) or long duration (saucer), while was less capable of causing disease when soil moisture was maintained >90% than when substrate moisture was maintained at a more moderate level (flood, 75% CC). Our results indicate that it is not necessary to flood plants to induce disease under experimental conditions and that disease induced by flooding can represent disease in container nurseries when containers are in pools of water or maintained at ∼75% CC. In addition, our results suggest that is a more aggressive pathogen than in nursery conditions where drainage is poor; however, both species are capable of causing a similar amount of disease under more typical irrigation management.
在疫霉根腐病研究中常用于诱发疾病的淹水程度在容器苗圃中很少出现。相反,过度灌溉和排水不畅导致植物周期性地处于浅水池中。为了确定淹水诱发的根腐病是否代表在模拟苗圃条件下,即植物处于浅水池(托盘)中,或允许自由排水并保持在容器容量约75%(CC)时所发生的病害,将杜鹃花植物种植在未受侵染的基质或受 或 侵染的基质中。一般来说, 比 引发的病害更多,并且所有水分处理都有利于根腐病的发生。在实验1中,淹水引发的病害量与托盘处理相似(未测试75% CC),而在实验2中,淹水引发的病害往往比托盘或75% CC处理更快且更严重。病原菌对水分处理的反应不同。在短时间(淹水)或长时间(托盘)内基质湿度>90%的处理中, 引发的病害更多,而当土壤湿度保持 >90%时, 引发病害的能力低于基质湿度保持在更适度水平(淹水、75% CC)时。我们的结果表明,在实验条件下没有必要对植物进行淹水来诱发疾病,并且当容器处于水池中或保持在约75% CC时,淹水诱发的疾病可以代表容器苗圃中的疾病。此外,我们的结果表明,在排水不良的苗圃条件下, 是比 更具侵袭性的病原菌;然而,在更典型的灌溉管理下,这两个物种引发的病害量相似。