Mortensen Alexander J, Metz Allan K, Froerer Devin L, Aoki Stephen K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
University of Utah, School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Dec;14(6):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09732-5. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
To characterize current concepts in capsular repair and hip instability, and examine findings from biomechanical and clinical studies on hip capsular management strategies as they pertain to hip stability, patient outcomes, and hip arthroscopy failure. Further, we discuss the clinical evaluation and treatment of capsular deficiency.
There remains debate regarding the optimal capsular management strategies in hip arthroscopy, particularly concerning the necessity of routine capsular repair. A variety of capsulotomy techniques exist and may be used to access the hip joint. Additionally, a wide variety of techniques are employed to repair the hip capsule. Biomechanical evidence supports capsular closure restores hip joint stability to that of the intact, native state. Several clinical studies in both primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings have demonstrated improved pain and functional outcomes in patients who underwent capsular repair or capsular reconstruction. Studies have shown capsular repair may be especially important in patients with ligamentous laxity and hip dysplasia, and in competitive athletes. Post-surgical hip instability secondary to capsular insufficiency is increasingly recognized as a cause of hip arthroscopy failure. Capsular closure restores native biomechanical stability to the hip joint, and several clinical studies report improved pain and functional outcomes following capsular repair or capsular reconstruction in both the primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings. There remains much to learn regarding capsular hip instability as it relates to optimal capsular management surgical technique, intra-operative capsular management decision-making, clinical diagnosis, and related advanced imaging findings.
综述目的:阐述目前关于髋关节囊修复和髋关节不稳定的概念,并审视有关髋关节囊处理策略的生物力学和临床研究结果,这些结果涉及髋关节稳定性、患者预后以及髋关节镜手术失败的情况。此外,我们还将讨论关节囊缺损的临床评估和治疗方法。
最新发现:关于髋关节镜检查中最佳的关节囊处理策略仍存在争议,特别是关于常规关节囊修复的必要性。存在多种关节囊切开技术,可用于进入髋关节。此外,还采用了各种各样的技术来修复髋关节囊。生物力学证据支持关节囊闭合可将髋关节稳定性恢复至完整的自然状态。在初次和翻修髋关节镜手术中进行的多项临床研究表明,接受关节囊修复或关节囊重建的患者疼痛减轻,功能预后改善。研究表明,关节囊修复在韧带松弛和髋关节发育不良的患者以及竞技运动员中可能尤为重要。因关节囊不足导致的术后髋关节不稳定越来越被认为是髋关节镜手术失败的一个原因。关节囊闭合可恢复髋关节的自然生物力学稳定性,多项临床研究报告称,在初次和翻修髋关节镜手术中,关节囊修复或关节囊重建后疼痛和功能预后均有所改善。关于髋关节囊不稳定与最佳关节囊处理手术技术、术中关节囊处理决策、临床诊断以及相关的先进影像学检查结果之间的关系,仍有许多需要了解的地方。