Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, London, Ontario.
London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Emergency Medicine, London, Ontario.
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 24;22(6):1211-1217. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.6.52060.
Patient visits to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care centre (UCC) for the sole purpose of requesting prescriptions are challenging for the patient, the physician, and the department. The primary objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of these patients, the nature of their requests, and the response to these requests. Our secondary objective was to determine the proportion of these medication requests that had street value.
This was a retrospective, electronic chart review of all adult patients requesting a prescription from a two-site ED and/or an UCC in a medium-sized Canadian city between April 1, 2014-June 30, 2017. Recorded outcomes included patient demographic data and access to a family doctor, medication requested, whether or not a prescription was given, and ED length of stay. Medication street value was determined using a local police service listing.
A total of 2,265 prescriptions were requested by 1,495 patients. The patient median [interquartile range] age was 43 [32-54] years. A family doctor was documented by 55.4% (939/1,694) of patients. The two most commonly requested categories of medications were opioid analgesics 21.2% (481/2,265) and benzodiazepine anxiolytics 11.7% (266/2,265). Of patients requesting medication, 50.5% (755/1,495) requested medications without street value including some with potential to cause serious adverse health effects if discontinued. The requested prescription was received by 19.9% (298/1,495) of patients; 15.3% (173/1,134) returned for further prescription requests. The 90th percentile length of stay was 3.2 and 5.6 hours at the UCC and ED, respectively.
Patients who presented to the ED or UCC sought medications with and without street value in almost equal measure. A more robust understanding of these patients and their requests illustrates why a 'one-size-fits-all' response to these requests is inappropriate and signals some fault lines within our local healthcare system.
患者仅因开处方而前往急诊部(ED)或紧急护理中心(UCC)就诊,这对患者、医生和部门来说都是一个挑战。本研究的主要目的是确定这些患者的特征、他们的请求性质以及对这些请求的回应。我们的次要目标是确定这些药物请求中有多少具有街头价值。
这是对 2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间在加拿大一个中等城市的两个 ED 和/或 UCC 要求开处方的所有成年患者的回顾性电子病历审查。记录的结果包括患者人口统计学数据和家庭医生的就诊情况、要求的药物、是否开具处方以及 ED 住院时间。药物的街头价值是使用当地警察部门的清单确定的。
共有 1495 名患者要求开具 2265 份处方。患者的中位数[四分位距]年龄为 43[32-54]岁。有 55.4%(939/1694)的患者记录了家庭医生的就诊情况。请求的药物中最常见的两类是阿片类镇痛药,占 21.2%(481/2265),苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药占 11.7%(266/2265)。在要求药物的患者中,50.5%(755/1495)要求没有街头价值的药物,其中一些药物如果停止使用可能会对健康产生严重不良影响。有 19.9%(298/1495)的患者收到了要求的处方;15.3%(173/1134)的患者回来要求进一步的处方。UCC 和 ED 的 90 百分位住院时间分别为 3.2 小时和 5.6 小时。
到 ED 或 UCC 就诊的患者既要求有街头价值的药物,也要求没有街头价值的药物,比例几乎相等。更深入地了解这些患者及其请求说明了为什么对这些请求采取“一刀切”的回应是不合适的,并表明了我们当地医疗体系中的一些缺陷。