Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1, Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, 18-7, Hachibuse, Shingu, Wakayama, 647-0072, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 17;11(1):22413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01846-7.
Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation has been established as the treatment for typical atrial flutter. Recently, ablation index (AI) has emerged as a novel marker for estimating ablation lesions. We investigated the relationship between CTI depth and ablation parameters on the procedural results of typical atrial flutter ablation. A total of 107 patients who underwent CTI ablation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography before catheter ablation. From the receiver-operating curve, the best cut-off value of CTI depth was < 4.1 mm to predict first-pass success. Although the average AI was not different between deep CTI (DC; CTI depth ≥ 4.1) and shallow CTI (SC; CTI depth < 4.1), DC required a longer ablation time and showed a lower first-pass success rate (p < 0.01). In addition, the catheter inversion technique was more frequently required in the DC (p < 0.01). The lowest AI sites of the first-pass CTI line were determined in both the ventricular (2/3 segment of CTI) and inferior vena cava (IVC, 1/3 segment of CTI) sides. The best cut-off values of the weakest AIs at the ventricular and IVC sides for predicting first-pass success were > 420 and > 386, respectively. Among patients with these cut-off values, the first-pass success rate was 89% in the SC and 50% in the DC (p < 0.01). Although ablation parameters were not significantly different, the first-pass success rate was lower in the DC than in the SC. Further investigation might be required for better outcomes in deep CTIs.
三尖瓣环峡部(CTI)线性消融已被确立为治疗典型心房扑动的方法。最近,消融指数(AI)已成为评估消融病灶的新标志物。我们研究了 CTI 深度与消融参数之间的关系,以评估典型心房扑动消融的程序结果。
这项回顾性研究共纳入 107 例行 CTI 消融的患者。所有患者均在导管消融前行 CT 检查。从接受者操作特征曲线来看,CTI 深度<4.1mm 预测首次通过成功率的最佳截断值。
虽然深 CTI(CTI 深度≥4.1mm)与浅 CTI(CTI 深度<4.1mm)的平均 AI 无差异,但 DC 需要更长的消融时间,且首次通过成功率较低(p<0.01)。此外,DC 中更常需要导管反转技术(p<0.01)。
首次通过 CTI 线的最低 AI 部位在心室(CTI 的 2/3 节段)和下腔静脉(IVC,CTI 的 1/3 节段)侧均有确定。预测首次通过成功率的心室和 IVC 侧最弱 AI 的最佳截断值分别为>420 和>386。在这些截距值的患者中,SC 的首次通过成功率为 89%,而 DC 的首次通过成功率为 50%(p<0.01)。尽管消融参数没有显著差异,但 DC 的首次通过成功率低于 SC。可能需要进一步研究以获得更好的深 CTI 结果。