Nguyen Thao L, Lam Weng Man, Orr Hillary, Gulbis Brian, Mauricio Riza, Tom Eric, Modem Vinai M, Coronado-Munoz Alvaro
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(8):821-827. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.8.821. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Dexmedetomidine has become a widely used drug in PICUs for sedation. We aim to determine the effects of clonidine on pediatric patients after dexmedetomidine use.
This was a retrospective cohort study that evaluated all pediatric patients admitted to a tertiary PICU who received dexmedetomidine infusion for >48 hours. Outcomes in patients exposed to clonidine (CLON) were compared with those of patients who were not exposed (NoCLON).
A total of 216 patients were included in this study (43 CLON and 173 NoCLON). The primary outcome, agitation, was less in the CLON cohort (9.3%) than in the NoCLON cohort (9.3% versus 29.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). Hospital LOS was longer in the CLON group (59 versus 20 days, p < 0.01), as was PICU LOS (37.4 versus 11.1 days, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of increased heart rate or blood pressure between the 2 cohorts. Patients exposed to concurrent midazolam and opioid infusions had higher incidence of agitation when they did not receive clonidine (CLON 8% versus NoCLON 37%, OR 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.51; p < 0.01). In contrast, there was no difference in the incidence of agitation for the CLON group versus the NoCLON group when dexmedetomidine was administered alone (25% versus 19%, OR 1.4; p = 0.99).
Our study confirms the importance and effectiveness of clonidine to treat agitation after dexmedetomidine discontinuation. A validated withdrawal scoring tool can help better define dexmedetomidine withdrawal in pediatric patients.
右美托咪定已成为儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中广泛使用的镇静药物。我们旨在确定可乐定对使用右美托咪定后的儿科患者的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了所有入住三级PICU且接受右美托咪定输注超过48小时的儿科患者。将暴露于可乐定(CLON)的患者的结局与未暴露(NoCLON)的患者的结局进行比较。
本研究共纳入216例患者(43例CLON和173例NoCLON)。主要结局,即躁动,在CLON队列中(9.3%)低于NoCLON队列(分别为9.3%对29.5%;p<0.01)。CLON组的住院时间更长(59天对20天,p<0.01),PICU住院时间也是如此(37.4天对11.1天,p<0.01)。两组间心率或血压升高的发生率无显著差异。同时接受咪达唑仑和阿片类药物输注的患者在未接受可乐定时躁动发生率更高(CLON为8%对NoCLON为37%,OR 0.15;95%CI,0.05 - 0.51;p<0.01)。相比之下,单独使用右美托咪定时,CLON组与NoCLON组的躁动发生率无差异(25%对19%,OR 1.4;p = 0.99)。
我们的研究证实了可乐定在治疗右美托咪定停药后躁动方面的重要性和有效性。一个经过验证的撤药评分工具有助于更好地界定儿科患者的右美托咪定撤药情况。