Taschner Christian A, Trinks Alexandra, Bardutzky Jürgen, Brich Jochen, Hartmann Ralph, Urbach Horst, Niesen Wolf-Dirk
Department of Neuroradiology, Freiburg University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 1;12:743151. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.743151. eCollection 2021.
Organizing regional stroke care considering thrombolysis as well as mechanical thrombectomy (MTE) remains challenging in light of a wide range of regional population distribution. To compare outcomes of patients in a stroke network covering vast rural areas in southwestern Germany who underwent MTE via direct admission to a single comprehensive stroke center [CSC; mothership (MS)] with those of patients transferred from primary stroke centers [PSCs; drip-and-ship (DS)], we undertook this analysis of consecutive stroke patients with MTE. Patients who underwent MTE at the CSC between January 2013 and December 2016 were included in the analysis. The primary outcome measure was 90-day functional independence [modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2]. Secondary outcome measures included time from stroke onset to recanalization/end of MTE, angiographic outcomes, and mortality rates. Three hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients were included (MS 222 and DS 110). Median age was 74 in both arms of the study, and there was no significant difference in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (median MS 15 vs. 16 DS). Intravenous (IV) thrombolysis (IVT) rates differed significantly (55% MS vs. 70% DS, = 0.008). Time from stroke onset to recanalization/end of MTE was 112 min shorter in the MS group (median 230 vs. 342 min, < 0.001). Successful recanalization [thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3] was achieved in 72% of patients in the MS group and 73% in the DS group. There was a significant difference in 90-day functional independence (37% MS vs. 24% DS, = 0.017), whereas no significant differences were observed for mortality rates at 90 days (MS 22% vs. DS 17%, = 0.306). Our data suggest that patients who had an acute ischemic stroke admitted directly to a CSC may have better 90-day outcomes than those transferred secondarily for thrombectomy from a PSC.
鉴于区域人口分布广泛,组织兼顾溶栓和机械取栓(MTE)的区域性卒中护理仍然具有挑战性。为了比较德国西南部一个覆盖广大农村地区的卒中网络中,直接入住单一综合卒中中心[CSC;母舰(MS)]接受MTE治疗的患者与从初级卒中中心[PSC;滴注转运(DS)]转诊的患者的结局,我们对连续接受MTE治疗的卒中患者进行了此项分析。纳入分析的患者为2013年1月至2016年12月期间在CSC接受MTE治疗的患者。主要结局指标为90天功能独立性[改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)0 - 2]。次要结局指标包括从卒中发作到再通/MTE结束的时间、血管造影结局和死亡率。共纳入332例连续患者(MS组222例,DS组110例)。研究的两组患者中位年龄均为74岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表基线评分无显著差异(MS组中位评分为15分,DS组为16分)。静脉溶栓(IVT)率有显著差异(MS组为55%,DS组为70%,P = 0.008)。MS组从卒中发作到再通/MTE结束的时间短112分钟(中位时间分别为230分钟和342分钟,P < 0.001)。MS组72%的患者实现了成功再通[脑梗死溶栓(TICI)2b - 3级],DS组为73%。90天功能独立性有显著差异(MS组为37%,DS组为24%,P = 0.017),而90天死亡率无显著差异(MS组为22%,DS组为17%,P = 0.306)。我们的数据表明,急性缺血性卒中患者直接入住CSC可能比从PSC转诊接受取栓治疗的患者有更好的90天结局。