• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剑突下入路剑突下单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗血清阳性重症肌无力可获得相当的缓解率,并可能更快恢复。

Subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy for seropositive myasthenia offers equivalent remission rates and potentially faster recovery.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar 31;34(4):576-583. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab294.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivab294
PMID:34792156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8972302/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) receiving subxiphoid-subcostal or unilateral thoracoscopic thymectomy and to identify the factors affecting MG prognosis.

METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2019, a total of 137 consecutive MG patients received subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy (STT, n = 65) or conventional unilateral thoracoscopic thymectomy (UTT, n = 72). The primary outcomes of this study were perioperative complications, duration and expenses of hospitalization, VAS score and complete stable remission (CSR).

RESULTS

The patients receiving STT had significantly shorter drainage duration and postoperative hospital stay and lower hospitalization expenses (P < 0.01). Pain scores on postoperative Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 were significantly lower in patients undergoing STT (P < 0.01). The average follow-up was 54.3 ± 24.18 months, with a CSR rate of 30.6% and an overall effective rate of 87.3%. Through uni- and multivariable analyses, shorter symptom duration and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class I were independent predictors for CSR in MG patients receiving thymectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study not only showed that STT was a safe and feasible technique for MG, with a potentially faster postoperative recovery, lower hospitalization expenses, less postoperative pain and equivalent remission rate, but also revealed that shorter symptom duration and MGFA class I were favourable prognostic factors for CSR.

摘要

目的

比较经剑突下肋缘下与单侧胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力(MG)患者的围手术期和随访结果,并确定影响 MG 预后的因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间 137 例连续接受经剑突下肋缘下胸腔镜胸腺切除术(STT,n=65)或传统单侧胸腔镜胸腺切除术(UTT,n=72)的 MG 患者。本研究的主要结局为围手术期并发症、住院时间和费用、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和完全稳定缓解(CSR)。

结果

STT 组患者的引流时间、术后住院时间和住院费用明显缩短(P<0.01)。STT 组患者术后第 1、3、7 和 14 天的疼痛评分明显较低(P<0.01)。平均随访时间为 54.3±24.18 个月,CSR 率为 30.6%,总有效率为 87.3%。通过单因素和多因素分析,发现症状持续时间较短和美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)Ⅰ级是接受胸腺切除术的 MG 患者 CSR 的独立预测因素。

结论

本研究不仅表明 STT 是一种安全可行的 MG 治疗技术,具有潜在更快的术后恢复、更低的住院费用、更少的术后疼痛和相当的缓解率,而且还揭示了较短的症状持续时间和 MGFA Ⅰ级是 CSR 的有利预后因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/2eaa52310a43/ivab294f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/aba1ded22c59/ivab294f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/bda75906de04/ivab294f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/2eaa52310a43/ivab294f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/aba1ded22c59/ivab294f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/bda75906de04/ivab294f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e34/8972302/2eaa52310a43/ivab294f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy for seropositive myasthenia offers equivalent remission rates and potentially faster recovery.剑突下入路剑突下单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗血清阳性重症肌无力可获得相当的缓解率,并可能更快恢复。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar 31;34(4):576-583. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab294.
2
Unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy offers long-term outcomes equivalent to that of the bilateral approach in the treatment of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.在治疗非胸腺瘤性重症肌无力方面,单侧电视辅助胸腔镜扩大胸腺切除术的长期疗效与双侧手术相当。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;21(5):610-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv176. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
3
Subxiphoid and subcostal arch versus unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery approaches to thymectomy for myasthenia gravis.剑突下和肋弓下与单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗重症肌无力胸腺切除术的对比研究
Surg Today. 2023 Jan;53(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02533-4. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Perioperative outcomes and mid-term effects in performing video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: subxiphoid versus right thoracic approaches.重症肌无力患者行电视胸腔镜扩大胸腺切除术的围手术期结局及中期效果:剑突下与右胸入路对比
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1529-1539. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.43.
5
Subxiphoid and subcostal arch "Three ports" thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis.剑突下和肋弓下“三孔”胸腔镜扩大胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1711-1720. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.11.
6
Improvement in symptom remission rate following robotic thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.重症肌无力患者行机器人胸腺切除术后症状缓解率的提高。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;30(6):827-833. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa021.
7
Comparative clinical outcomes after thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: Thoracoscopic versus trans-sternal approach.胸腺瘤切除术治疗重症肌无力的临床疗效比较:胸腔镜与胸骨正中劈开入路。
Asian J Surg. 2018 Jan;41(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
8
The Outcomes of Subxiphoid Thoracoscopic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymic Diseases.剑突下胸腔镜手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺疾病的疗效比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):508-513. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0734. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy versus open thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis: a meta-analysis.重症肌无力患者行电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术与开放性胸腺切除术的Meta分析
Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Oct;116(5):282-288. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1176419. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Clinical Comparative Analyses of Thymectomy Between Subxiphoid and Subcostal Arch Thoracoscopic Resection and Median Sternotomy for the Treatment of Thymoma With Myasthenia Gravis in Chinese Patients.剑突下与肋弓下胸腔镜切除术及正中胸骨切开术胸腺切除术治疗中国重症肌无力患者胸腺瘤的临床对比分析
J Surg Res. 2023 May;285:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.019. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy using a double sternum retractor versus conventional approaches.使用双胸骨牵开器的剑突下单孔电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术与传统方法的临床结果
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):3200-3209. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2267. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Surgical management of thymic tumors: a narrative review with focus on robotic-assisted surgery.胸腺肿瘤的外科治疗:一项以机器人辅助手术为重点的叙述性综述
Mediastinum. 2024 Nov 7;8:48. doi: 10.21037/med-24-17. eCollection 2024.
3
Analysis of different surgical approaches to the treatment of thymoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of subxiphoid approach versus lateral approach for thoracoscopic Thymectomy.剑突下入路与外侧入路胸腔镜下胸腺切除术的Meta分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 12;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01135-w.
2
Perioperative outcomes and mid-term effects in performing video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: subxiphoid versus right thoracic approaches.重症肌无力患者行电视胸腔镜扩大胸腺切除术的围手术期结局及中期效果:剑突下与右胸入路对比
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1529-1539. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.43.
3
Surgical effect and prognostic factors of myasthenia gravis with thymomas.
胸腺瘤不同手术治疗方法的分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 7;19(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03081-3.
4
Physiological and pathological roles of the thymus and value of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis: a narrative review.胸腺的生理和病理作用及胸腺切除术在重症肌无力中的价值:一项叙述性综述
Mediastinum. 2024 May 21;8:31. doi: 10.21037/med-23-43. eCollection 2024.
5
A proof-of-concept study: advantages of the subxiphoid over the lateral intercostal approach.一项概念验证研究:剑突下途径相较于肋间外侧途径的优势。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 May 2;38(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae067.
6
Clinical study of thoracoscopic assisted different surgical approaches for early thymoma: a meta-analysis.胸腔镜辅助不同手术入路治疗早期胸腺瘤的临床研究:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11832-7.
7
Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of subcostal thoracoscopy and median sternotomy in treating thymoma: a propensity score-matching analysis.经肋缘下胸腔镜与胸骨正中切开术治疗胸腺瘤的临床疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231214470. doi: 10.1177/03000605231214470.
8
Neurological outcomes of extended thymectomy for thymomatous myasthenia gravis: Subxiphoid vs. trans-sternal approaches.胸腺瘤型重症肌无力扩大胸腺切除术的神经学转归:剑突下与胸骨正中入路对比
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 6;9:973954. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.973954. eCollection 2022.
9
Effect Evaluation of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Thymectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.剑突下与肋间胸腺切除术的效果评估:一项Meta分析与系统评价
Front Surg. 2022 May 31;9:925003. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.925003. eCollection 2022.
10
Feasibility of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery via Subxiphoid Approach in Anterior Mediastinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.剑突下入路胸腔镜手术在前纵隔手术中的可行性:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2022 May 6;9:900414. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.900414. eCollection 2022.
胸腺瘤合并重症肌无力的手术效果及预后因素。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 May;11(5):1288-1296. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13396. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
The Outcomes of Subxiphoid Thoracoscopic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymic Diseases.剑突下胸腔镜手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺疾病的疗效比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):508-513. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0734. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Surgical Techniques for Myasthenia Gravis: Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.重症肌无力的外科手术技术:电视辅助胸腔镜手术
Thorac Surg Clin. 2019 May;29(2):165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Short-term outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in mediastinal diseases.纵隔疾病单孔与多孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的短期疗效比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):216-220. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx217.
7
Definitions and standard indications of minimally-invasive techniques in thymic surgery.胸腺手术中微创技术的定义及标准适应证
J Vis Surg. 2017 Aug 21;3:99. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.06.04. eCollection 2017.
8
Myasthenia Gravis.重症肌无力
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2570-2581. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1602678.
9
The Subxiphoid Approach Leads to Less Invasive Thoracoscopic Thymectomy Than the Lateral Approach.剑突下入路比外侧入路导致的胸腔镜胸腺切除术创伤更小。
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):763-770. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3783-8.
10
Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis.重症肌无力胸腺切除术的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):511-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602489.