Sabatschus Ingo, Bösl Irmgard, Prevoo Marlou, Eerdekens Mariëlle, Sprünken Arne, Galm Oliver, Forstner Michael
Grünenthal GmbH, 52099, Aachen, Germany.
Mesama-Consulting, Bärschwil, Switzerland.
Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):73-91. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00340-2. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) is difficult to treat. Several oral drugs are recommended as first-line treatments. Nevertheless, many patients cannot obtain sufficient pain relief or do not tolerate systemically active treatments. Topical treatments, with a lower risk of systemic side effects such as lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster, are also recommended in treatment guidelines. This analysis compares the benefit-risk balance of topical 700 mg lidocaine medicated plaster with the benefit-risk balance of oral pregabalin administration for the treatment of PNP following current recommendations on benefit-risk assessment (BRA) methodology.
The Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) framework was used as structured approach. Selection of key benefits and risks was supported by a patient survey. Published randomized controlled clinical trials were the main source to identify data related to key benefits and risks. The outcome of randomized clinical trials was compared with real-world evidence (RWE) data for consistency.
Identified key benefits were pain reduction and improvement in quality of life. Key risks identified were application site reactions, dizziness, confusion, weight gain, peripheral edema, and blurred vision. Overall, there was similarity in key benefits between the comparators; however, a clear advantage regarding key risks in favor of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was observed. This observation was consistent across data from a direct comparison trial, randomized placebo-controlled trials, as well as data from RWE studies. The low number of randomized controlled trials for lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster was the main limitation.
Guided by the opinion of patients regarding key benefits and risks deemed important for treatments of peripheral neuropathic pain, our analysis showed that lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster has a more favorable benefit-risk balance compared to pregabalin (300 and 600 mg daily).
外周神经性疼痛(PNP)难以治疗。几种口服药物被推荐作为一线治疗药物。然而,许多患者无法获得足够的疼痛缓解,或者不耐受全身活性治疗。治疗指南中也推荐使用全身副作用风险较低的局部治疗,如700毫克利多卡因药用贴剂。本分析根据当前关于获益-风险评估(BRA)方法的建议,比较了700毫克利多卡因局部药用贴剂与口服普瑞巴林治疗PNP的获益-风险平衡。
采用获益-风险行动小组(BRAT)框架作为结构化方法。通过患者调查辅助选择关键获益和风险。已发表的随机对照临床试验是识别与关键获益和风险相关数据的主要来源。将随机临床试验的结果与真实世界证据(RWE)数据进行比较以确保一致性。
确定的关键获益为疼痛减轻和生活质量改善。确定的关键风险为应用部位反应、头晕、意识模糊、体重增加、外周水肿和视力模糊。总体而言,比较组之间在关键获益方面存在相似性;然而,观察到在关键风险方面,700毫克利多卡因药用贴剂具有明显优势。这一观察结果在直接比较试验、随机安慰剂对照试验的数据以及RWE研究的数据中均一致。700毫克利多卡因药用贴剂的随机对照试验数量较少是主要局限性。
根据患者对被认为对外周神经性疼痛治疗重要的关键获益和风险的看法,我们的分析表明,与普瑞巴林(每日300和600毫克)相比,700毫克利多卡因药用贴剂具有更有利的获益-风险平衡。