Mora Johanna R, Wong Robert, Shaikh Mehmooda, Askelson Margarita
Non-clinical Disposition and Bioanalysis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Immunology and Fibrosis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;4(2):177-186. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11375. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
The goal of this article is to present the analysis of anti-abatacept antibody data from children with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA), treated with abatacept. The data are from 395 participants with pJIA from two abatacept registrational trials.
We analyzed immunogenicity data according to age groups, administration route (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]), drug treatment interruption, and co-medications (with or without methotrexate [MTX]) to assess impact on the incidence of anti-abatacept antibodies.
The overall immunogenicity incidences observed in both JIA trials ranged between 4.7% and 23.3%. There was a slightly higher immunogenicity incidence in the 2-5-year-old participants (15.2%) compared with 6-17-year-old participants (4.7%). In the study with SC dosing, the overall incidence on treatment was 2.3% (3% if co-dosed with MTX), similar to the incidence for Period A of the IV study (similar duration of treatment as the SC study), which was 2.1% (1.4% if co-dosed with MTX). In the IV study, the period following a 6-month interruption in treatment had comparable immunogenicity incidences (22.9% with interruption vs. 18.2% without interruption, both co-dosed with MTX and 0% for both not co-dosed with MTX). In most cases, participants co-dosed with MTX had higher immunogenicity incidences than those on abatacept alone.
Although some trends were noted in terms of incidence according to age and MTX co-dosing, none where conclusive owing to differences in population size. Drug holiday had no impact on immunogenicity incidence once treatment was resumed, and incidences across SC and IV dosing were comparable. There was no impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.
本文旨在对接受阿巴西普治疗的多关节型幼年特发性关节炎(pJIA)患儿的抗阿巴西普抗体数据进行分析。数据来自两项阿巴西普注册试验中的395名pJIA参与者。
我们根据年龄组、给药途径(静脉注射[IV]或皮下注射[SC])、药物治疗中断情况以及合并用药(联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤[MTX])分析免疫原性数据,以评估其对抗阿巴西普抗体发生率的影响。
两项幼年特发性关节炎试验中观察到的总体免疫原性发生率在4.7%至23.3%之间。2至5岁参与者的免疫原性发生率(15.2%)略高于6至17岁参与者(4.7%)。在皮下给药的研究中,治疗期间的总体发生率为2.3%(与MTX联合给药时为3%),与静脉注射研究A期的发生率(治疗持续时间与皮下注射研究相似)相似,为2.1%(与MTX联合给药时为1.4%)。在静脉注射研究中,治疗中断6个月后的免疫原性发生率相当(中断治疗时为22.9%,未中断治疗时为18.2%,两者均与MTX联合给药,未与MTX联合给药时均为0%)。在大多数情况下,与MTX联合给药的参与者的免疫原性发生率高于单独使用阿巴西普的参与者。
尽管根据年龄和MTX联合给药情况在发生率方面观察到一些趋势,但由于人群规模的差异,均无定论。停药假期对恢复治疗后的免疫原性发生率没有影响,皮下注射和静脉注射给药的发生率相当。免疫原性对药代动力学、安全性和疗效没有影响。