Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Heald and Grace); KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Heald, Santiago de Araújo Pio, Rivera Theurel, and Grace); School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (Ms Liu); Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Hospital Loire-Vendée-Océan, Machecoul, France (Dr Pavy); and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Grace).
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022 Mar 1;42(2):103-108. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000619.
Evidence proves that health care providers should promote cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to patients face-to-face to increase CR enrollment. An online course was designed to promote this at the bedside; it is evaluated herein in terms of reach, effect on knowledge, attitudes, discussion self-efficacy and practices, and satisfaction.
Design was observational, one-group pre- and post-test. Some demographics were requested from learners taking all language versions of the 20-min course: English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, and simplified Chinese, available at: https://globalcardiacrehab.com/CR-Utilization. Investigator-generated items in the pre- and post-test and evaluation survey administered using Google Forms were based on Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model.
The course was initiated by 522 learners from 33 of 203 (16%) countries; most commonly female (n = 341, 65%) nurses (n = 180, 34%) from high-income countries (n = 259, 57%) completing the English (n = 296, 57%) and Chinese (n = 108, 21%) versions. A total of 414 (79%) learners completed the post-test and 302 (58%) completed the evaluation. Median CR attitudes were 5 of 5 on the Likert scale at pre-test, suggesting some selection bias. Mean CR knowledge ([7.22 ± 2.14]/10), discussion self-efficacy ([3.86 ± 0.85]/5), and practice ([4.13 ± 1.11]/5) significantly improved after completion of the course (all P < .001). Satisfaction was high regardless of language version ([4.44 ± 0.64]/5; P = .593).
This free, open-access course is effective in increasing CR knowledge, self-efficacy, and encouragement practices among participating inpatient cardiac providers, with high satisfaction. While testing impact on actual CR use is needed, it should be more broadly disseminated to increase reach, in an effort to increase patient enrollment in CR, to reduce morbidity and mortality.
有证据表明,医疗保健提供者应面对面地向患者宣传心脏康复(CR),以增加 CR 的参与率。为此设计了一门在线课程,旨在床边进行推广;本文从覆盖范围、对知识、态度、讨论自我效能感和实践以及满意度的影响方面对其进行了评估。
设计为观察性、单组前后测试。从参加 20 分钟课程所有语言版本(英语、葡萄牙语、法语、西班牙语和简体中文,可在以下网址获得:https://globalcardiacrehab.com/CR-Utilization)的学习者那里请求了一些人口统计学信息:https://globalcardiacrehab.com/CR-Utilization。使用 Google Forms 进行的课前和课后评估调查中的调查员生成项目基于 Kirkpatrick 的培训评估模型。
该课程由来自 203 个国家中的 33 个国家的 522 名学习者发起;最常见的是女性(n = 341,65%)护士(n = 180,34%)来自高收入国家(n = 259,57%),完成了英语(n = 296,57%)和中文(n = 108,21%)版本。共有 414 名(79%)学习者完成了课后测试,302 名(58%)完成了评估。在课前,CR 态度的中位数为 5 分(Likert 量表),表明存在一定的选择偏差。完成课程后,CR 知识([7.22 ± 2.14]/10)、讨论自我效能感([3.86 ± 0.85]/5)和实践([4.13 ± 1.11]/5)显著提高(均 P <.001)。无论语言版本如何,满意度都很高([4.44 ± 0.64]/5;P =.593)。
这门免费的、开放获取的课程在提高参与心脏康复的住院患者提供者的 CR 知识、自我效能感和鼓励实践方面是有效的,并且满意度很高。虽然需要测试其对实际 CR 使用的影响,但应更广泛地传播,以扩大覆盖面,努力增加患者参与 CR,降低发病率和死亡率。