Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel; Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
Theor Popul Biol. 2022 Feb;143:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
The evolution of altruism has been extensively modeled under the assumption of genetic transmission, whereas the dynamics under cultural transmission are less well understood. Previous research has shown that cultural transmission can facilitate the evolution of altruism by increasing (1) the probability of adopting the altruistic phenotype, and (2) assortment between altruists. We incorporate vertical and oblique transmission, which can be conformist or anti-conformist, into models of parental care, sibling altruism, and altruism between individuals that meet assortatively. If oblique transmission is conformist, it becomes easier for altruism to invade a population of non-altruists as the probability of vertical transmission increases. If oblique transmission is anti-conformist, decreasing vertical transmission facilitates invasion by altruism in the assortative meeting model, whereas in other models, there is a trade-off: greater vertical transmission produces greater assortment among genetically related altruists, but lowers the probability of adopting altruism via anti-conformity. Compared to conditions for invasion under genetic transmission, e.g., Hamilton's rule, we show that invasion can be easier with sufficiently strong anti-conformity, and in some models, with sufficiently high assortment even if oblique transmission is conformist. We also explore invasion by an allele A that increases individuals' content bias for altruism, in the absence of other forms of cultural transmission. If costs and benefits combine additively, A invades under previously known conditions. If costs and benefits combine multiplicatively, invasion by A and by altruism become more difficult than in the corresponding additive models.
利他主义的进化在遗传传递的假设下得到了广泛的建模,而文化传递下的动态则理解得较少。以前的研究表明,文化传递可以通过增加(1)采用利他表型的概率,以及(2)利他主义者之间的分类,促进利他主义的进化。我们将垂直和斜向传递(可以是从众的或反从众的)纳入父母养育、兄弟姐妹利他主义和有选择地相遇的个体之间的利他主义模型中。如果斜向传递是从众的,随着垂直传递概率的增加,利他主义更容易入侵一个非利他主义者群体。如果斜向传递是反从众的,在有选择地相遇的模型中,减少垂直传递有利于利他主义的入侵,而在其他模型中,则存在权衡:更大的垂直传递会在遗传上相关的利他主义者之间产生更大的分类,但会降低通过反从众采用利他主义的概率。与遗传传递下的入侵条件(例如汉密尔顿规则)相比,我们表明,通过足够强的反从众,甚至在某些模型中,通过足够高的分类,入侵可能更容易,即使斜向传递是从众的。我们还探索了在没有其他形式的文化传递的情况下,一个增加个体对利他主义的内容偏见的等位基因 A 的入侵。如果成本和收益相加,A 在以前已知的条件下入侵。如果成本和收益相乘,A 的入侵和利他主义的入侵比在相应的加性模型中更困难。