Suppr超能文献

特发性肺纤维化二线抗纤维化药物的耐受性和疗效。

Tolerability and efficacy of second-line antifibrotics in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;71:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102099. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone reduce disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and have also shown to improve survival. Switching first-line antifibrotic drug may required in IPF due to disease progression or intolerable adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of second-line antifibrotic treatment in patients with IPF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at three referral interstitial lung disease centers who received first-line antifibrotics more than one month and switched the treatment to a second-line antifibrotic agent during January 2016-June 2021. The drug's safety was evaluated based on the type of adverse effect. Disease progression was defined as an absolute decline in FVC of >10% within 12 months with or without radiological progression.

RESULTS

Among 629 consecutive patients with IPF, 66 patients switched antifibrotics. The median duration of antifibrotics was 13 (1-41) months prior to the switch, and 14 (2-42) months after the switch. The mean age was 70.6 ± 8.9 years and, median FVC (%) was 72.1 ± 18.7 at the initiation of first-line antifibrotics. The most common reason for the switch was disease progression (56%) followed by severe adverse effects (SAEs) (44%). SAEs were significantly less observed after the switch compared before the switch (43.9% vs12.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). Eighteen patients had adverse effects due to second-line antifibrotics. Among these patients, 10 had mild adverse effects and 8 had severe adverse effects. While there was no change in the FVC (%) values in 30.3% patients 12 months after the first-line antifibrotic treatment (before the switch), there was no change in the FVC (%) values in 40% patients at the end of 12 months after the switch. Fourteen patients (42.4%) who received antifibrotic treatment before the switch had more than 10% decline in FVC (%) at the end of 12 months. Eight patients (32.0%) had 10% or more decline in FVC (%) 12 months after the switch.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IPF who do not tolerate first-line antifibrotic treatment or those showing disease progression despite treatment, switching antifibrotics may be a feasible management strategy.

摘要

背景

尼达尼布和吡非尼酮这两种抗纤维化药物可减缓特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的疾病进展,并且已显示出可改善生存率。由于疾病进展或无法耐受的不良反应,可能需要在 IPF 患者中更换一线抗纤维化药物。本研究旨在评估 IPF 患者二线抗纤维化治疗的安全性和疗效。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性、多中心研究,在三家转诊间质性肺病中心进行,这些中心在 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间接受了一线抗纤维化药物治疗超过一个月,并在该期间将治疗方案转换为二线抗纤维化药物。药物安全性基于不良反应的类型进行评估。疾病进展定义为 12 个月内 FVC 绝对值下降>10%,无论是否存在影像学进展。

结果

在 629 例连续的 IPF 患者中,有 66 例患者更换了抗纤维化药物。在转换前,一线抗纤维化药物的中位持续时间为 13(1-41)个月,转换后为 14(2-42)个月。起始一线抗纤维化药物时的平均年龄为 70.6±8.9 岁,中位 FVC(%)为 72.1±18.7。更换药物的最常见原因是疾病进展(56%),其次是严重不良反应(SAEs)(44%)。与转换前相比,转换后 SAE 明显减少(分别为 43.9%和 12.1%,p<0.001)。18 例患者因二线抗纤维化药物出现不良反应。这些患者中,10 例为轻度不良反应,8 例为重度不良反应。在一线抗纤维化治疗 12 个月后(转换前),30.3%的患者 FVC(%)值无变化,而在转换后 12 个月结束时,40%的患者 FVC(%)值无变化。在转换前接受抗纤维化治疗的 14 例患者(42.4%)在 12 个月结束时 FVC(%)下降超过 10%。在转换后 12 个月时,8 例患者(32.0%)FVC(%)下降 10%或更多。

结论

对于不能耐受一线抗纤维化治疗的 IPF 患者或尽管接受治疗仍有疾病进展的患者,更换抗纤维化药物可能是一种可行的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验