Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Chair, Gaps And Harmonization Committee, ACR Appropriateness Criteria; Portfolio Director, Society of Abdominal Radiology; Chair, Section Urinary Imaging, Scientific Program Committee, American Roentgen Ray Society.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S251-S267. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.010.
The appropriate evaluation of adrenal masses is strongly dependent on the clinical circumstances in which it is discovered. Adrenal incidentalomas are masses that are discovered on imaging studies that have been obtained for purposes other than adrenal disease. Although the vast majority of adrenal incidentalomas are benign, further radiological and biochemical evaluation of these lesions is important to arrive at a specific diagnosis. Patients with a history of malignancy or symptoms of excess hormone require different imaging evaluations than patients with incidentalomas. This document reviews imaging approaches to adrenal masses and the various modalities utilized in evaluation of adrenal lesions. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
肾上腺肿块的适当评估强烈依赖于其发现的临床情况。偶然发现的肾上腺肿块是在为其他肾上腺疾病目的而进行的影像学研究中发现的肿块。尽管绝大多数偶然发现的肾上腺肿块是良性的,但对这些病变进行进一步的影像学和生化评估对于得出明确的诊断很重要。有恶性肿瘤病史或激素过多症状的患者需要不同于偶然发现的肾上腺肿块的影像学评估。本文回顾了肾上腺肿块的影像学方法以及用于评估肾上腺病变的各种方法。美国放射学院的适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,每年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和修订包括对同行评议期刊的现有医学文献进行广泛分析,并应用成熟的方法学(RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和推荐评估、制定和评估分级或 GRADE)对特定临床情况下的影像学和治疗程序的适宜性进行评分。在证据不足或存在争议的情况下,专家意见可以补充现有证据,以推荐影像学或治疗。