• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统对接受根治性子宫切除术治疗的宫颈癌病例进行重新分类。

Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago, 683-8505, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishimachi, Yonago, 683-8505, Japan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;60(6):1054-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.016
PMID:34794737
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We re-classified patients with stage IB-II disease (based on the 2008 system) and compared the outcomes with those obtained after using the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the data of 154 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at our hospital during 2006-2016. Pathological, histological, and radiographic data were used to re-classify the cases based on the 2018 FIGO system. We compared these outcomes to those obtained after using the 2008 FIGO assignments. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from primary therapy initiation until death or the last follow-up examination.

RESULTS

The histological types were squamous cell carcinoma (108 cases) and others (46 cases). The 2008 FIGO system assignments were stage IB1, IB2, IIA1, IIA2, and IIB (87, 27, seven, five, and 28 patients, respectively). The new 2018 FIGO system assignments were stage IB1, IB2, IB3, IIA1, IIA2, IIB, and IIIC1 (52, 26, 16, six, three, 21, and 30 patients, respectively). Re-classification to stage IIIC1 disease was observed for previously assigned stage IB1, IB2, IIA1, IIA2, and IIB cases (10, seven, two, two, and nine cases, respectively). The median OS durations based on the 2018 FIGO system were 71.7, 61.1, and 62.3 months for patients with stage IB1, IB2, and IB3 (p = 0.04) disease, respectively. The new stage IB3/IIA2/IIB cases had longer OS than the old stage IB2/IIA2/IIB cases. A positive computed tomography (CT) finding of nodal involvement was observed in 37% of cases with pathological confirmation of pelvic lymph node (LN) involvement. Using CT to identify pelvic LN metastasis had a sensitivity of 37% and specificity of 93%.

CONCLUSION

The 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy showed a better ability to differentiate survival outcomes. However, the image evaluation method should be reconsidered.

摘要

目的

我们重新分类了 2008 系统中 IB-II 期(基于 2018 年国际妇产科联合会 FIGO 分期系统)的患者,并比较了使用 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统和 2008 年 FIGO 分期系统的结果。

材料和方法

我们回顾了 2006 年至 2016 年期间在我院接受根治性子宫切除术的 154 例宫颈癌患者的资料。使用病理学、组织学和影像学数据,根据 2018 年 FIGO 系统重新分类病例。我们将这些结果与使用 2008 年 FIGO 分配的结果进行比较。总生存(OS)从开始原发性治疗到死亡或最后一次随访检查。

结果

组织学类型为鳞状细胞癌(108 例)和其他类型(46 例)。2008 年 FIGO 系统分配为 IB1、IB2、IIA1、IIA2 和 IIB(87、27、7、5 和 28 例患者)。新的 2018 年 FIGO 系统分配为 IB1、IB2、IB3、IA1、IA2、IIB 和 IIIC1(52、26、16、6、3、21 和 30 例患者)。重新分类为 IIIC1 期疾病见于先前分配为 IB1、IB2、IA1、IA2 和 IIB 期的病例(分别为 10、7、2、2 和 9 例)。根据 2018 年 FIGO 系统,IB1、IB2 和 IB3 期患者的中位 OS 分别为 71.7、61.1 和 62.3 个月(p=0.04)。新的 IB3/IA2/IIB 病例的 OS 长于旧的 IB2/IA2/IIB 病例。在有盆腔淋巴结(LN)病理证实的情况下,37%的病例 CT 检查发现淋巴结受累。使用 CT 识别盆腔 LN 转移的敏感性为 37%,特异性为 93%。

结论

根治性子宫切除术后宫颈癌的 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统显示出更好的生存结果区分能力。然而,应重新考虑图像评估方法。

相似文献

1
Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.根据 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统对接受根治性子宫切除术治疗的宫颈癌病例进行重新分类。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;60(6):1054-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.016.
2
Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.根据2018年修订的国际妇产科联盟早期宫颈癌(分期为IB)分期系统的临床病理危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19714. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019714.
3
[Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].32例早期子宫颈神经内分泌癌临床分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;50(3):198-203.
4
Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.重新审视宫颈癌 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统修订版中的腹主动脉旁淋巴结受累情况。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Sep;300(3):675-682. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05232-7. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.IIA1期与IIA2期宫颈癌的局部区域扩散及生存情况
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(2):887-90. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.887.
6
The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB2期宫颈癌患者行根治性子宫切除术后的最佳肿瘤大小上限。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jul;30(7):975-980. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001271. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?修订后的 2018 年 FIGO 宫颈癌分期系统是否比之前分期为 IB 期的女性的 2009 年 FIGO 分期系统更具预后价值?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
8
[Effects of pre-chemotherapy hemoglobin and platelet levels in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy].[新辅助化疗后行根治性子宫切除术治疗的 Ib2-IIb 期宫颈癌患者化疗前血红蛋白和血小板水平的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;47(8):577-81.
9
Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期系统对具有手术风险因素的宫颈癌患者的预后价值。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jun 13;11:5473-5480. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S203059. eCollection 2019.
10
The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).宫颈癌患者盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的预后价值;国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)新分类(IIIC期)的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Apr;171:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.023. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-evaluating prognostic factors for cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis: a Japanese multicenter cohort study based on FIGO 2018.重新评估伴有淋巴结转移的宫颈癌的预后因素:一项基于国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018年标准的日本多中心队列研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar;30(3):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02697-2. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Stage migration and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer at Stage IIIC according to the 2018 FIGO staging system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期系统,IIIC期宫颈癌患者的分期迁移与生存结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1460543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1460543. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on gynecological cancer incidence: a large cohort study in Japan.
COVID-19 对妇科癌症发病率的影响:日本的一项大型队列研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan;29(1):72-77. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02431-w. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
4
AMIGO2 expression as a predictor of recurrence in cervical cancer with intermediate risk.AMIGO2表达作为中度风险宫颈癌复发的预测指标。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2023 May 26;19(1):56. doi: 10.3892/mco.2023.2652. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Pretreatment Radiologically Enlarged Lymph Nodes as a Significant Prognostic Factor in Clinical Stage IIB Cervical Cancer: Evidence from a Taiwanese Tertiary Care Center in Reaching Consensus.治疗前影像学检查显示淋巴结肿大作为临床IIB期宫颈癌的重要预后因素:来自台湾一家三级医疗中心的共识证据
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 14;12(5):1230. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051230.
6
Receptor for activated C kinase 1 promotes cervical cancer lymph node metastasis via the glycolysis‑dependent AKT/mTOR signaling.激活蛋白激酶 C 受体 1 通过糖酵解依赖性 AKT/mTOR 信号促进宫颈癌淋巴结转移。
Int J Oncol. 2022 Jul;61(1). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5373. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Impact of the COVID-19-pandemic on patients with gynecological malignancies undergoing surgery: A Dutch population-based study using data from the 'Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit'.COVID-19 大流行对接受手术治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤患者的影响:一项基于荷兰人群的研究,使用了来自“荷兰妇科肿瘤学审计”的数据。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Feb 22.