Musser Erica D, Morris Stephanie S J, Feeney Kathleen, Pintos Lobo Rosario, Ester Edward F
ABC ERICA Laboratory, Center for Children and Families, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 2;12:750525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750525. eCollection 2021.
Although inattention is a key symptom subdomain of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the mechanisms underlying this subdomain and related symptoms remain unclear. There is a need for more granular approaches that allow for greater specificity in linking disruptions in specific domains of cognitive performance (e.g., executive function and reward processing) with behavioral manifestations of ADHD. Such approaches may inform the development of more targeted therapeutic interventions. Here, we describe the results of a pilot study of elementary-aged children (ages 6-12years) with ADHD (=50) and typically developing children (=48) utilizing a cognitive science task designed to target two dissociable mechanisms of attentional selection: a goal-driven mechanism (i.e., reward/value-driven) and a salience-driven mechanism. Participants were asked to optimally extract and combine information about stimulus salience and value to maximize rewards. While results of this pilot study are ambiguous due to the small sample size and limited number of task trials, data suggest that neither participants with ADHD nor typically developing participants performed optimally to maximize rewards, though typically developing participants were somewhat more successful at the task (i.e., more likely to report high-value targets) regardless of task condition. Further, the manuscript examines several follow-up questions regarding group differences in task response times and group differences in task performance as related to sustained attention across the duration of the task. Finally, the manuscript examines follow-up questions related to heterogeneity in the ADHD group (i.e., age, DSM 5 presentation, and comorbid diagnosis) in predicting task performance.
尽管注意力不集中是注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一个关键症状子领域,但该子领域及相关症状背后的机制仍不清楚。需要采用更细化的方法,以便在将认知表现特定领域(如执行功能和奖赏处理)的干扰与ADHD的行为表现联系起来时具有更高的特异性。此类方法可能为更具针对性的治疗干预措施的开发提供依据。在此,我们描述了一项针对患有ADHD的小学年龄段儿童(6至12岁,n = 50)和发育正常儿童(n = 48)的试点研究结果,该研究使用了一项认知科学任务,旨在针对注意力选择的两种可分离机制:目标驱动机制(即奖赏/价值驱动)和显著性驱动机制。参与者被要求最佳地提取并整合有关刺激显著性和价值的信息,以最大化奖赏。虽然由于样本量小和任务试验次数有限,这项试点研究的结果不明确,但数据表明,无论是患有ADHD的参与者还是发育正常的参与者都没有为了最大化奖赏而达到最佳表现,不过发育正常的参与者在任务中稍微更成功一些(即更有可能报告高价值目标),无论任务条件如何。此外,本文探讨了几个后续问题,涉及任务反应时间的组间差异以及与任务持续期间持续注意力相关的任务表现的组间差异。最后,本文探讨了与ADHD组的异质性(即年龄、DSM-5表现和共病诊断)在预测任务表现方面相关的后续问题。