Public Health Department of Social Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.
Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e020760. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020760. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Background It is uncertain whether risk classification under the nationwide program on screening and lifestyle modification for metabolic syndrome captures well high-risk individuals who could benefit from lifestyle interventions. We examined the validity of risk classification by linking the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and Results Individual-level data of 29 288 Japanese individuals aged 40 to 74 years without a history of CVD from 10 prospective cohort studies were used. Metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of high abdominal obesity and/or overweight plus risk factors such as high blood pressure, high triglyceride or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and high blood glucose levels. The risk categories for lifestyle intervention were information supply only, motivation-support intervention, and intensive support intervention. Sex- and age-specific hazard ratios and population attributable fractions of CVD, which were also further adjusted to consider non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, were estimated with reference to nonobese/overweight individuals, using Cox proportional hazard regression. Since the reference category included those with risk factors, we set a supernormal group (nonobese/overweight with no risk factor) as another reference. We documented 1023 incident CVD cases (565 men and 458 women). The adjusted CVD risk was 60% to 70% higher in men and women aged 40 to 64 years receiving an intensive support intervention, and 30% higher in women aged 65 to 74 years receiving a motivation-support intervention, compared with nonobese/overweight individuals. The population attributable fractions in men and women aged 40 to 64 years receiving an intensive support intervention were 17.7% and 6.6%, respectively, while that in women aged 65 to 74 years receiving a motivation-support intervention was 9.4%. Compared with the supernormal group, nonobese/overweight individuals with risk factors had similar hazard ratios and population attributable fractions as individuals with metabolic syndrome. Conclusions Similar CVD excess and attributable risks among individuals with metabolic syndrome components in the absence and presence of obesity/overweight imply the need for lifestyle modification in both high-risk groups.
背景 目前尚不清楚全国范围内的代谢综合征筛查和生活方式干预计划下的风险分类是否能很好地识别出那些可能从生活方式干预中受益的高危个体。我们通过将心血管疾病(CVD)的发病率与该风险分类进行关联,来检验其有效性。
方法和结果 我们使用了来自 10 项前瞻性队列研究的 29288 名年龄在 40 至 74 岁之间、无 CVD 病史的个体的个体水平数据。代谢综合征的定义为存在高腹部肥胖和/或超重,以及高血压、高甘油三酯或低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平和高血糖等危险因素。生活方式干预的风险类别为仅提供信息、动机支持干预和强化支持干预。使用 Cox 比例风险回归,根据非肥胖/超重个体,参考非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平,估计 CVD 的性别和年龄特异性危险比和人群归因分数。由于参考类别包括有危险因素的个体,我们将超正常组(无危险因素的非肥胖/超重个体)设定为另一个参考。我们记录了 1023 例 CVD 事件(565 名男性和 458 名女性)。与非肥胖/超重个体相比,40 至 64 岁接受强化支持干预的男性和女性的 CVD 风险分别增加了 60%至 70%,65 至 74 岁接受动机支持干预的女性的 CVD 风险增加了 30%。40 至 64 岁接受强化支持干预的男性和女性的人群归因分数分别为 17.7%和 6.6%,而 65 至 74 岁接受动机支持干预的女性为 9.4%。与超正常组相比,有代谢综合征组分的非肥胖/超重个体的危险比和人群归因分数与有代谢综合征的个体相似。
结论 在不存在和存在肥胖/超重的情况下,具有代谢综合征组分的个体发生 CVD 的风险增加和归因风险相似,这意味着这两个高危群体都需要进行生活方式干预。