• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社会规范的洗手干预措施(包括洗手站)和仅设置洗手站的干预措施对科特迪瓦城市地区用肥皂洗手行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。

Effects of a social norm-based handwashing intervention including handwashing stations, and a handwashing station-only intervention on handwashing with soap in urban Côte d'Ivoire: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Dec;9(12):e1707-e1718. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00387-9.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00387-9
PMID:34798030
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diarrhoeal diseases are an important cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to evaluate the effect of three handwashing interventions on handwashing with soap (HWWS) after toilet use.

METHODS

In this cluster randomised trial in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, we randomly assigned communal housing compounds (1:1:1) to receive one of three interventions: a theory of normative social behaviour (TNSB) intervention, including provision of handwashing stations; handwashing stations only; and no intervention. The TNSB intervention was designed to shift the outcome expectation associated with HWWS from health to riddance of faeces-related disgust, and to increase the perceived descriptive norm and perceived handwashing publicness. Participants and fieldworkers were masked to the study objectives. The primary outcome was HWWS after toilet use, assessed at 1 month and 5 months follow-ups. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR201501000892239.

FINDINGS

Between April 10 and May 22, 2014, we identified 92 eligible compounds, of which 75 compounds were included. Follow-up data on HWWS were available for 23 compounds for the TNSB group, 25 compounds for the handwashing station-only group, and 25 compounds for the control group. The study ended in April, 2017. Compared with a frequency of 5% (29 of 604 occasions) in the control group, HWWS after toilet use increased to 9% (49 of 557 occasions; adjusted risk ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·16-3·08) in the handwashing station-only group, and 24% (143 of 588 occasions; 4·82, 3·06-7·59) in the TNSB group, at the 1-month follow-up. The intervention effect was only sustained in the TNSB group (98 [22%] of 450 compounds; 2·68, 1·65-4·34).

INTERPRETATION

A social norm-based handwashing intervention combined with disgust-inducing messages, with provision of handwashing stations, was effective at increasing HWWS after toilet use. The provision of handwashing stations alone had little effect. Future studies should investigate whether the same approach, when delivered via mass media, can have a similar effect to the face-to-face delivery used in this study.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

在撒哈拉以南非洲,腹泻病是 5 岁以下儿童死亡的一个重要原因。我们旨在评估三种洗手干预措施对使用厕所后用肥皂洗手(HWWS)的影响。

方法

在科特迪瓦阿比让的这项整群随机试验中,我们将公共住房区(1:1:1)随机分配接受以下三种干预措施之一:规范性社会行为理论(TNSB)干预,包括提供洗手站;仅提供洗手站;不干预。TNSB 干预旨在将与 HWWS 相关的结果预期从健康转变为摆脱与粪便相关的厌恶,并增加感知描述性规范和感知公共洗手。参与者和现场工作人员对研究目标不知情。主要结局是使用厕所后进行 HWWS,在 1 个月和 5 个月随访时进行评估。分析采用意向治疗。这项试验在泛非临床试验注册处(PACTRO201501000892239)注册。

结果

在 2014 年 4 月 10 日至 5 月 22 日期间,我们确定了 92 个符合条件的住房区,其中 75 个住房区被纳入研究。TNSB 组有 23 个住房区、洗手站组有 25 个住房区和对照组有 25 个住房区提供了关于使用厕所后进行 HWWS 的随访数据。研究于 2017 年 4 月结束。与对照组的频率为 5%(604 次中有 29 次)相比,在洗手站组,HWWS 增加到 9%(557 次中有 49 次;调整后的风险比 1.89,95%CI 1.16-3.08),而在 TNSB 组增加到 24%(588 次中有 143 次;4.82,3.06-7.59),在 1 个月随访时。干预效果仅在 TNSB 组持续存在(450 个住房区中有 98 个[22%];2.68,1.65-4.34)。

解释

基于社会规范的洗手干预措施结合引起厌恶的信息,并提供洗手站,可有效增加使用厕所后的 HWWS。单独提供洗手站的效果很小。未来的研究应探讨通过大众媒体传递的类似方法是否能产生与本研究中面对面传递相同的效果。

资金

无。

相似文献

1
Effects of a social norm-based handwashing intervention including handwashing stations, and a handwashing station-only intervention on handwashing with soap in urban Côte d'Ivoire: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于社会规范的洗手干预措施(包括洗手站)和仅设置洗手站的干预措施对科特迪瓦城市地区用肥皂洗手行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Dec;9(12):e1707-e1718. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00387-9.
2
Measuring social norms related to handwashing: development and psychometric testing of measurement scales in a low-income urban setting in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.测量与洗手相关的社会规范:在科特迪瓦阿比让的一个低收入城市环境中对测量量表的开发和心理测量测试。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e048929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048929.
3
Effect of a novel hygiene intervention on older children's handwashing in a humanitarian setting in Kahda district, Somalia: A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial.一种新型卫生干预措施对索马里卡达区人道主义环境中大龄儿童洗手行为的影响:一项集群随机对照等效试验
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114163. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
Effect of a water, sanitation and hygiene program on handwashing with soap among household members of diarrhoea patients in healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of the CHoBI7 mobile health program.孟加拉国医疗机构中腹泻患者家庭成员用肥皂洗手的水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案效果:CHoBI7 移动医疗方案的一项群组随机对照试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Aug;25(8):1008-1015. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13416. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预措施对肯尼亚农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30005-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
6
Comparing the behavioural impact of a nudge-based handwashing intervention to high-intensity hygiene education: a cluster-randomised trial in rural Bangladesh.比较基于推动的洗手干预措施对高强度卫生教育的行为影响:孟加拉国农村地区的一项集群随机试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jan;23(1):10-25. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12999. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan.在苏丹难民营中生活的年长儿童中开展的惊喜肥皂手部卫生干预措施的整群随机对照等效试验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012633.
8
Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial.水质、环境卫生、手卫生和营养干预对孟加拉国农村地区腹泻和儿童生长的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Effect of an equipment-behavior change intervention on handwashing behavior among primary school children in Kenya: the Povu Poa school pilot study.肯尼亚一项设备-行为改变干预对小学生洗手行为的影响:Povu Poa 学校试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6902-2.
10
Sustained improvements in handwashing indicators more than 5 years after a cluster-randomised, community-based trial of handwashing promotion in Karachi, Pakistan.在巴基斯坦卡拉奇开展以社区为基础的促进手卫生的集群随机对照试验 5 年多后,手卫生指标持续改善。
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Mar;18(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12046. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the mechanisms of change in social norms around tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions.理解烟草使用社会规范的变化机制:干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):215-235. doi: 10.1111/add.16685. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
Facilitating hand hygiene in displacement camps during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative assessment of a novel handwashing stand and hygiene promotion package.在新冠疫情期间促进流离失所者营地的手部卫生:对一种新型洗手台及卫生促进套餐的定性评估
Confl Health. 2022 Dec 16;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00492-8.
3
Hand Hygiene Social Norms Among Healthcare Workers During Early COVID-19: Results of a Global Survey.
医护人员在 COVID-19 早期的手卫生社会规范:全球调查结果。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;67:1604981. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604981. eCollection 2022.